Solving inclined plane in different axis.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the acceleration of a block on an inclined plane using different coordinate axes. While the user successfully calculates acceleration with axes aligned to the incline, they struggle with horizontal and vertical axes due to confusion over vertical forces not summing to zero. It is clarified that the acceleration of the block has a vertical component, necessitating a more complex approach when using horizontal and vertical axes. The solution involves incorporating the constraint that acceleration is parallel to the incline. Ultimately, the user successfully resolves the problem with this understanding.
tousif1995
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I can work out the acceleration of a block that will take along the plane when the axes are the ones along and perpendicular to the inclined plane. But, when I choose a horizontal and vertical axis I end up with the same mistake as this guy in this thread did:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=238180

In that thread, it is said that the vertical forces don't add up to zero. I don't get it and hence I cannot solve the problem when the axis is horizontal and vertical. Can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tousif1995 said:
In that thread, it is said that the vertical forces don't add up to zero. I don't get it and hence I cannot solve the problem when the axis is horizontal and vertical. Can anyone help?
The acceleration of the block is parallel to the incline, so it will have a vertical component. So the vertical forces on the block cannot sum to zero.

Obviously, it's much easier to solve the problem using coordinates aligned parallel and perpendicular to the surface. But if you insist, you can solve it using vertical and horizontal axes. It just takes a bit more work, since you must add the constraint that the acceleration is parallel to the surface.
 
Thank you!

masinθ = -(Rcosθ-mg)
Rsin = macosθ

Just solved it! feels good :cool:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top