Solving Induced EMF Problem with Jordan's Help

AI Thread Summary
In the physics experiment, a coil with 160 turns is rotated from perpendicular to parallel to Earth's magnetic field, resulting in an induced EMF. The correct induced EMF value is 3.10×10^-4 V, derived from the change in magnetic flux as the coil transitions from maximum to zero flux. The calculation involves converting the area from cm² to m² and using the average induced EMF formula, which considers the total change in flux over the time interval. The discussion emphasizes understanding the physical concepts rather than relying solely on formulas. The key takeaway is that the total induced EMF is the product of the number of turns and the average induced EMF for one coil.
Jordanosaur
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi guys -

Here's the problem I'm stuck on:

In a physics laboratory experiment, a coil with 160 turns enclosing an area of
13.7 (cm^2) is rotated during the time interval 4.60×10−2(s) from a position in which its plane is perpendicular to Earth's magnetic field to one in which its plane is parallel to the field. The magnitude of Earth's magnetic field at the lab location is 6.50×10−5 (T).


I am not able to figure out how they came up with that figure of induced EMF as

3.10*10^-4

If you use NwBAsin(wt), you come out with 4.86*10^-4 V. Am I missing something in my calculations? Unless I am misunderstanding, this is a rotational motion question requiring the calculation of angular speed for the change in flux.

(PI/2) / (4.60*10^-2) = w (angular velocity)

sin(wt) = 1, therefore change in flux = NwBA

Any help or advice would be much appreciated

Thanks

Jordan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer 3.1E-4 V is correct.

Don't think of it in terms of equations. I hate this "Formula physics" that I'm seeing everywhere!

The flux goes from a maximum (when perpendicular) to a minimum (zero when parallel).

The change in flux is then simply whatever the maximum is (because the final flux is zero).

Flux is the amount of field cutting a unit area. Don't forget to convert from cm^2 to m^2.

Induced emf is given by the rate of change of flux.
Average induced emf is given by the change in flux per change in time.

You know the change in the flux (simply the max flux), and the change in time for this.

Then, since there are 160 coils, the total emf is 160 times the emf for one coil.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top