Solving Inelastic Collision for Two Hockey Players | Physics Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving an inelastic collision problem involving two 75 kg hockey players colliding at an angle of 125 degrees. The initial calculations for final velocity components using the formula Vf = m1v1/(m1+m2) are incorrect. Participants suggest applying the conservation of momentum principle, emphasizing the need to establish x and y axes for accurate calculations. A key tip is to define the x-axis along the bisector of the 125-degree angle to simplify momentum calculations. This approach will lead to a more accurate determination of the final velocity after the collision.
Huskies213
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Can anyone tell me what i am doing wrong for this problem?
Two 75 kg hockey players skating at 5.75 m.s collide and stick together. If the angle btween their initial directions was 125 degrees, what is their velocity after the collision?

I used the formula Vf = m1v1/(m1+m2) cos 125 for the x value which is supposed to come out to be 1.23 m/s

and the same formula Vf = m1v1/(m1+m2) sin 125 for the y value which is supposed to come out to be 2.36 m/s.

Thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Go back to basics with conservation of momentum:
m_1\vec{v_1} + m_2\vec{v_2} = (m_1 + m_2)\vec{v_f}

Establish x and y axes, and write expressions for momentum conservation for each direction separately.

Hint: If you define your x-axis to be along the line bisecting that 125 degree angle, your momentum calculations will be greatly simplified.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top