Solving Inequality: -∞ < a < -3 ∨ -1 < a < ∞

  • Thread starter Thread starter andreask
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The inequality |1/(2+a)| < 1 can be solved by breaking it into two separate conditions: 1/(2+a) < 1 and 1/(2+a) > -1. The correct approach requires using "and" instead of "or" for the conjunction of these inequalities. A critical point to consider is that 2+a cannot equal zero, which means a cannot be -2. The final solution involves finding the intersection of the inequalities derived from both conditions, leading to the boundaries -∞ < a < -3 and -1 < a < ∞.
andreask
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi

I'm trying to solve this inequality

|1/(2+a)| < 1.

1/(2+a) < 1 ∨ 1/(2+a) > -1

1 < 2+a
a > -1

and

1 > -2-a
3 > -a
a > -3

I know that the boundaries are
-∞ < a < -3 ∨ -1 < a < ∞

What have I done wrong?

thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
|1/(2+a)|-1<0, result of adding -1 to both sides.Examine two conditions separately. The case, 2+a>=0, and the case, 2+a<0. Follow each solution process separately.

I can't think in advance if they will be conjoint or disjoint, but you'll find out once both conditions are solved.

Be aware, the expression 2+a must not be allowed equal to zero, meaning a<>-2;
so -2 is a critical value.
 
andreask said:
Hi

I'm trying to solve this inequality

|1/(2+a)| < 1.

1/(2+a) < 1 ∨ 1/(2+a) > -1
The connector above should be ∧ ("and") rather than "or".

If |x| < b, then an equivalent inequality is -b < x < b. This is what you should have done here.
andreask said:
1 < 2+a
When you multiply both sides by 2 + a, are you multiplying by a positive number or a negative number? It makes a difference as regards the inequality symbol.
andreask said:
a > -1

and

1 > -2-a
3 > -a
a > -3

I know that the boundaries are
-∞ < a < -3 ∨ -1 < a < ∞

What have I done wrong?

thanks in advance
 
The case with the negative sign should read 1/(2+a) < -1. Take absolute value on both sides is equivalent to changing sign on both sides, which requires reversing the inequality direction.
 
For an alternate approach
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> -1 &amp; &lt; \frac 1 {2+a} &lt; 1 \\<br /> -(2+a)^2 &amp; &lt; (2+a) &lt; (2+a)^2 \\<br /> -a^2 - 4a - 4 &amp; &lt; 2+a &lt; a^2 + 4a + 4 \\<br /> -a^2 - 5a - 6 &amp; &lt; 0 &lt; a^2 + 3a + 2 \\<br /> -\left(a^2 + 5a + 6\right) &lt; 0 &lt; a^2 + 3a + 2 \\<br /> -(a+3)(a+2) &lt; 0 &lt; (a+1) (a+2)<br /> \end{align*}<br />
Solve the right inequality, solve the left inequality. The solution is the intersection of the two parts.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top