Solving Kinetic Friction: Min Force Needed to Prevent Sliding

AI Thread Summary
To prevent the small cube from sliding down the large cube, the applied force P must be sufficient to overcome the weight of the small cube. The static friction force (fs) between the cubes must equal or exceed the weight of the small cube, calculated as 31.36 N. The static friction can be expressed as fs = μsN, where μs is the coefficient of static friction (0.71). By rearranging the equations, the minimum force P required is determined to be 31.36 N. Understanding the forces acting on both cubes is crucial for creating an accurate force diagram.
devnull
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
5. The drawing shows a large cube (mass = 23 kg) being accelerated across a horizontal frictionless surface by a horizontal force P. A small cube (mass = 3.2 kg) is in contact with the front surface of the large cube and will slide downward unless P is sufficiently large. The coefficient of static friction between the cubes is 0.71. What is the smallest magnitude that P can have in order to keep the small cube from sliding downward?


I'm having trouble writing a force diagram. I know the formulas to use but I don't know which direction the forces are in. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Static friction, not kinetic

Originally posted by devnull
I'm having trouble writing a force diagram. I know the formulas to use but I don't know which direction the forces are in.
Give it a shot. Take each cube and write down all the forces acting on it. (Don't forget Newton's 3rd law.)

Hint: Besides the applied force P, I see three "kinds" of forces: weight, friction, and normal forces.
 


Sure, I can try to help you with the force diagram. Let's start by labeling the forces involved in this scenario. We have the force P acting on the large cube, the weight of the large cube (mg), the normal force from the surface on the large cube (N), and the force of static friction between the two cubes (fs).

Now, let's consider the motion of the small cube. Since it is in contact with the front surface of the large cube, it will experience the same acceleration as the large cube. Therefore, the only force acting on the small cube is the force of static friction (fs) from the large cube.

Next, let's consider the motion of the large cube. Since it is being accelerated by the force P, the net force on the large cube is P - fs. In order to prevent the small cube from sliding downward, the force of static friction (fs) must be equal to or greater than the weight of the small cube (mg). This can be represented as fs ≥ mg.

Now, let's use the formula for static friction, which is fs = μsN, where μs is the coefficient of static friction and N is the normal force. We can rearrange this formula to solve for N, which gives us N = fs/μs.

Substituting this into our previous inequality, we get fs ≥ mg = (3.2 kg)(9.8 m/s^2) = 31.36 N.

Now, we can substitute this value for fs in our net force equation: P - 31.36 N ≥ 0. This means that the minimum magnitude for P is 31.36 N in order to prevent the small cube from sliding downward.

I hope this helps with your force diagram and understanding of the problem. Let me know if you have any further questions.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top