Solving Ladderoperator Problem for c_+ Expressed in j and m

  • Thread starter Thread starter danja347
  • Start date Start date
danja347
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I need help figuring out the expression for the constant c_+
expressed in j and m in the following equation:

\hat J_+|Y_{jm}>=c_+|Y_{jm+1}>

Y is just spherical harmonics and \hat J_+=\hat J_x + i\hat J_y is a ladderoperator.

/Daniel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
danja347 said:
I need help figuring out the expression for the constant c_+
expressed in j and m in the following equation:

\hat J_+|Y_{jm}>=c_+|Y_{jm+1}>

Y is just spherical harmonics and \hat J_+=\hat J_x + i\hat J_y is a ladderoperator.

/Daniel

1.Have u tried to look it into your QM book?It's something pretty "classical".Try Cohen-Tanoudji.
2.I would have given u alink,but the server at univ texas at austin is dead.Anyway...I would have actually wanted to upload that chapter from the course,but the server wouldn't accept anything more than 50KB.

Good Luck!
 
Thanks... its all clear now! :-/
 
trying to recall...oh yeah:

J+|jm>=C|j(m+1)>

<jm|adjoint(J+)=<j(m+1)|C*

J+=Jx+iJy
adjoint(J+)=Jx-iJy=J- (since J is Hermitian)

<jm|adjoint(J+)=<jm|J-

So taking the inner product:

<jm|J-J+|jm> = CC*<j(m+1)|j(m+1)> = CC*

J-J+=(Jx-iJy)(Jx+iJy)=JxJx+JyJy+i[Jx,Jy]=J^2 - (Jz)^2 -hJz

<jm|J-J+|jm>=<jm|J^2 - (Jz)^2 -hJz}jm>=j(j+1)h^2 -m^2 h^2 - h^2 m = CC*

So taking the square root:

C=h sqrt(j(j+1) -m^2 -m)
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top