Solving Laplace's Equation Homework Statement

  • Thread starter Thread starter satchmo05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laplace's equation
satchmo05
Messages
108
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a really dumb question, but I want to make sure this is right...
So I have the integral (d2V)/(dф2) = 0. I am solving for the potential function on the bounds, 0 < ф < фo. I will also be solving on range of фo < ф < 2∏.


Homework Equations


The Laplace equation is above.


The Attempt at a Solution


So, I am just having my doubts... When solving for 0 < ф < фo, I take the first integral with respect to d/dф, and after this I get dV/dф = arbitrary constant. If I take another integral on this (after multiplying both sides by dф), I get V = фo*arbitrary constant, right?!?

When solving for the other bounds, фo < ф < 2∏, I get V = arbitrary constant*(2∏ - фo), yes?!

Thank you for all help, I apologize for the silly question. I just wanted to make sure...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you mean in one dimension is a solution to Laplace's equation a linear function, a*phi+b. Yes, it is. On the other hand, if you are working in two dimensions and phi is an angular coordinate, then you've got the Laplace equation wrong. It has to involve the other coordinate as well.
 
Q: Consider a system consisting of a pair of earthed conducting plates at right angles to each other, one at the z=0 and the other in the y=0 plane and a positive point charge Q at (0,1,2). Show that Laplace's equation (with appropriate boundary conditions) can be solved for this system by replacing the conducting plates with a family of image charges.

I really don't know where to start, it'd be great if someone could help please.
 
Start by reviewing how to do it with one plate and why it works. Two plates isn't that much harder.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top