Solving Linear Differential System: Eigenvalues & Exact Solutions

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I am studying a system described by a set of first order linear differential equations as can be seen on the attached picture. Now I know that to solve this analytically for a given N, N denoting the matrix size, one has to find the eigenvalues of the given matrix, which translates into finding the roots of an nth order polynomial, which is in general not possible.
But if you look at the matrix on the picture, which has a special structure, would it then be possible to find the exact eigenvalues of it and then find the exact solution of the system.
I should mention that the boundary conditions are simply:
x1(0) = 1, xn(0)=0, N≥n>1
If not by an eigenvalue method are there any other ways to find an exact solution?
 

Attachments

  • matrix.png
    matrix.png
    9.1 KB · Views: 463
Physics news on Phys.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tridiagonal_matrix might be of some help.
In your figure, the bottom right subscripts don't conform to the pattern of those at the top left.
Did you mean
n-1,n-2 n-1,n-1, n-1,n
n,n-2 0 0
?
Or did you intend the value in the last line to be the same as the one above it:
n-1,n-2 n-1,n-1, n-1,n
n-1,n-2 0 0
?
 
No the matrix differs does not follow the pattern in the first and last row.
 
But its still tridiagonal
 
aaaa202 said:
No the matrix differs does not follow the pattern in the first and last row.

Your matrix is not square: it has n rows and (n+1) columns. Therefore, your DE system does not make sense.
 
Oh sorry the drawing is wrong. So it is a tridiagonal matrix as described in the link above but with a_NN zero and a_12 zero. Is it possible to solve the eigenvalue equation for such a matrix exactly?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top