Solving Linear Equations (fractions)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the linear equation 2(x-1)/3 = (x/4)+1 by multiplying both sides by 12 to eliminate fractions. The concept of the Lowest Common Denominator (LCD) is explained, identifying 12 as the LCD for 3 and 4, which simplifies the equation effectively. Participants clarify the multiplication of fractions and the rules governing them, emphasizing how to manipulate equations to isolate variables. Additionally, there is a discussion about the equality of fractions, concluding that if two fractions are equal, their denominators must also be equal. Overall, the conversation provides a thorough understanding of fraction manipulation in linear equations.
annalise17
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm taking a step back as I've found a concept I'm struggling with. If I have an equation:

2(x-1)/3 = (x/4)+1

I've been told I need to multiply by 12 to give me:

8(x-1) = 3x+12

However I'm struggling with the multiplication of fractions in his instance. Can anyone advise me how that calculation works? I understand the remainder of the working. Thanks :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you remember the rules of fractions?

If you have some fraction, say, \frac{2}{3} and you multiply it by 9, there are various ways to represent the same number. You could have:

=9\cdot \frac{2}{3} (note, the dot just means multiply, as x could be confused with a variable)

=\frac{9\cdot 2}{3}

=\frac{18}{3}

=\frac{9}{3}\cdot 2

=3\cdot 2

=6

Now notice the expression \frac{9}{3}\cdot 2=3\cdot 2. We essentially cancel out the denominator this way, which is what you're trying to do in your problem.

So why do we multiply your question by 12 and not just any other number? Well, what we're looking for is something called the Lowest Common Denominator (LCD) of 3 and 4. What this means is that we want the first number that both 3 and 4 multiply into.

Multiples of 3:
3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, ...

Multiples of 4:
4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, ...

Notice the common multiples are 12 and 24. But we want the LCD which would be 12.

So now when you multiply \frac{2(x-1)}{3} by 12, you get 12\cdot \frac{2(x-1)}{3}=\frac{12}{3}\cdot 2(x-1)=4\cdot 2(x-1)=8(x-1)

and if you multiply the other side by 12, you get 12\left(\frac{x}{4}+1\right)=\frac{12x}{4}+12=3x+12

Just remember the common rules of fractions:

a\cdot\frac{b}{c}=\frac{ab}{c}=\frac{a}{c}\cdot b=a\cdot b\cdot\frac{1}{c}

etc.
 
That's great thank you :) Following on from that I know that Y/x1 = y/x2 cancels down to give x1 = x2 but can you explain why?
 
annalise17 said:
That's great thank you :) Following on from that I know that Y/x1 = y/x2 cancels down to give x1 = x2 but can you explain why?

Can you multiply the left side of the equation with x1 and simultaneously also multiply the right side with x1?

After that multiply left and right with x2.

And finally divide left and right by y.
 
annalise17 said:
That's great thank you :) Following on from that I know that Y/x1 = y/x2 cancels down to give x1 = x2 but can you explain why?

What I like Serena said.

Also, you can think of it logically. If \frac{2}{x}=\frac{2}{y} then for these to be equal, don't x and y need to be the same?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top