Solving Logarithms: Find Where You're Going Wrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter answerseeker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the logarithmic equation log_3(2x+3) - log_3(x+1) = 2. The correct approach involves using the property of logarithms to combine the logs into a single equation, leading to 2x + 3 = 2(x + 1). The confusion arises from whether to manipulate the equation further or leave it in a specific form. Additionally, there is a query about graphing logarithmic functions, specifically regarding switching x and y coordinates to find the inverse. The final takeaway emphasizes ensuring the function is one-to-one before performing the coordinate interchange.
answerseeker
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I can't seem to find where I am going wrong on this Question. it asks to solve:

log_3 (2x+3) - log_3(X+1) = 2 where _3 is the base of 3 for log

so far i moved the log_3(x+1) to the right side of equal sign. then i moved the 2 up as an exponent:

log_3(2x+3) = log_3(x+1)^2 then i canceled the logs out and moved the 2 back down so its :

2x+3 = 2(x+1)

then distributed the 2 to the x+1 , but then the x's cancel.

i think that maybe i should have just left it as (x+1)^2 ? is that where I am going wrong? or do i actually have to divide 2x+3 by x+1 instead of moving the log_3(x+1) over?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Logarithms have the property that log(a)-log(b)=log(a/b) if they have the same base. So you do this to combine the logs, next you undo the logs by raising the base of the log to the power of both each side i.e. if log(a/b)=c where c is a constant then a/b=k^c where k is the base of the log. After this it is a matter of algebra.
 
okay, that's much clearer, thnx.
now I'm a bit confused on how to graph logs.
log_5(y+2)=x+1

What I did, changed the whole equation into Exponential Form. I then graphed that and then switched the X and Y coordinates.

Is that the correct procedure? Do I only interchange the X and Y coordinates once? <not once and the beginning then again after graphing?>
 
When you switch the y and the x cooridinates to find a solution by graphing, solve for y. Or in other words, find the inverse of the function, and before you do that find out if the function is one-to-one.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top