Solving Logarithms: Find x in 2x^2-7x+3 = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Coco12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the logarithmic equation Log(2x-3)=log(4x-3)-logx. Participants analyze the algebraic manipulation, noting errors in simplification and factorization. The proposed solution of x=3 is challenged, as it does not satisfy the original logarithmic equation upon verification. Additionally, the importance of correctly applying the domain restrictions for each logarithmic expression is emphasized. Ultimately, the need for careful algebraic handling and consideration of the logarithmic properties is highlighted to arrive at a valid solution.
Coco12
Messages
272
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

Log(2x-3)=log(4x-3)-logx

Homework Equations



Logcl =logcr
L=r

The Attempt at a Solution


Quotient law of logs

So I simplfied:
Log(2x-3)=log(4x-3)/x

Since same base:
2x-3=4x-3/x

2x^2-7x+3=0
(X-1)(x-6)

The ans is supposed to be 3. I don't know what I'm doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you double checked your algebra? After you've removed the logarithms and come up with the algebraic equation, are you sure you manipulated it into a polynomial correctly?
 
Coco12 said:

Homework Statement




Log(2x+5)=log(4x-3)-logx

Homework Equations



Logcl =logcr
L=r

The Attempt at a Solution


Quotient law of logs

So I simplfied:
Log(2x+3)=log(4x-3)/x
First it was log(2x + 5), but now it's log(2x + 3). Which one is it?
Coco12 said:
Since same base:
2x+3=4x-3/x

2x^2-7x+3
(X-1)(x-6)

The ans is supposed to be 3. I don't know what I'm doing wrong?

For the equation you posted, 3 is not a solution. Here's the check:
If x = 3,
log(11) =? log(9) - log(3)
log(11) =? log(9/3) = log(3)
Since log(11) ≠ log(3), 3 is not a solution.

In your work you need a few more parentheses.
Coco12 said:
So I simplfied:
Log(2x+3)=log(4x-3)/x

Since same base:
2x+3=4x-3/x
In the two equations above, log(4x-3)/x should be written as log[(4x - 3)/x], and 4x -3/x is not the same as (4x - 3)/x.
Coco12 said:
2x^2-7x+3
(X-1)(x-6)
In what you have above, you started with an equation, but lost the = 0, so you're not working with equations any more.


Have you copied the equation correctly? If so, did you look at the right solution? There's also the possibility that the answer in your book is wrong.
 
Ya it's supposed to be 2x-3. That is what the book says.. That the ans is 3.

I think 3 is right. Because when I plugged in into the equation, I got it..

However how did they get that?
 
Last edited:
Coco12 said:
Ya it's supposed to be 2x-3.
Which is different from either of the two expressions you had before. You need to be more careful!
Coco12 said:
That is what the book says.. That the ans is 3.
So besides missing the brackets, is the solution correct?

No.
Just before you did the factoring, you had 2x2 - 7x + 3, which is correct as far as it goes.

It should be 2x2 - 7x + 3 = 0.

Try again on the factorization.

You will also need to consider the domain for each individual log expression.
What are the restrictions on x so that log(2x - 3) is defined?
What are the restrictions on x so that log(4x - 3) is defined?
What are the restrictions on x so that log(x) is defined?

Your solution has to be in an interval for what all three log expressions are defined.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Even if it is supposed to be 2x-3, you're factorization is still incorrect. To see why, simply try plugging in the roots you found back into the logarithmic equation, as Mark44 suggested, or even in the polynomial from which you obtained the roots. You will find that they do not satisfy the equation.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top