Solving Machine Problem 1: Frictionless Steel Shuttle

  • Thread starter Thread starter amrit2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Machine
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a steel shuttle moving along a fixed unlubricated rail, pulled by an elastic cord at a 45-degree angle. Participants express confusion about the absence of friction in the problem, noting that it simplifies calculations for introductory classes. The term "fixed unlubricated" raises questions about potential friction, suggesting a deeper context that may not be fully explained in the problem. There is also commentary on the quality of textbook questions, indicating that they may be oversimplified or lacking necessary details. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of understanding physics problems in educational settings.
amrit2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. A machine has a steel shuttle that is moving along a fixed unlubricated steel rail pulled by an elastic shuttle cord, which is at an angle

The shuttle has a mass of 800g and is released when the elastic cord has 20N tension at an angle of 45 degrees.


I know how to solve the problem, but I do not know why friction does not play a role here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
amrit2 said:
I know how to solve the problem, but I do not know why friction does not play a role here.
Because you are in an introductory class and it makes the maths too hard.

It's the strange world of classroom physics, where springs have no mass, air has no resistance and inclined planes go on for ever!
 
What strikes me though is the term "fixed unlubricated," which makes it seem as if the problem is trying to hint that there is friction.
 
It would normally mean you are considering a rolling rather than sliding wheel - this makes a difference because of angualr momentum.
Often the questiosn don't make sense because they were originally longer and had a second part that needed the extra info - but for a new edition, or a lower level course they chop off part 2.

If you ever think - "is it me or is this a stupid question in the textbook", consider how little money you get for writing and checking textbook questions!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top