Maple Solving Maple Function Minimize Problem with Cristian

  • Thread starter Thread starter cva
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maple
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using Maple to minimize a function f with respect to variables A1, A2, and A3, which are dependent on a variable v. The user initially struggles with the output of the minimize function, specifically with the order of variables in the result when using the location=true option. It is noted that Maple displays results in a set format, which does not maintain the order of variables, unlike lists. The user seeks a way to extract the values of A1(v), A2(v), and A3(v) corresponding to the minimized function value fm(v). Eventually, the user finds a solution by utilizing the subs command to extract the values from the output array, clarifying that the output does not directly provide the values but rather the rules that the variables must follow to achieve the minima.
cva
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a problem with maple. My code is like this:


f(A1(v),A2(v),A3(v))

fm:=minimize(f,A1=-1..1,A2=-1..1,A3=-1..1)

so that I obtain a fm(v). But I also need to find A1(v),A2(v),A3(v) that minimize f.

Do you know any way to do this?




Cristian
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the location=true option for minimize, that is put

fm:=minimize(f,A1=-1..1,A2=-1..1,A3=-1..1, location=true);

by the way, if you need to know something of this nature, there's a reasonable chance of finding it in the help docs for whatever Maple command you are using. To get the help docs open for a Maple command,
like "minimize" put type

?minimize

at your Maple prompt.
 
Thanks for your reply. My problem is that all these variables are function of v. and I need to have the dependence A1(v),A2(v) and A3(v).
fm:=minimize(..., location=true) gives an array , but unfortunatley ,aple does not keep the order of the variables, every time is different.

For example:

fm[1] := 0.2075577438e-1, {[{A2 = 0.3304115674e-2, A3 = -.5155123546, A1 = 0.9409892271e-1}, 0.2075577438e-1]}
fm[2] := 0.2074929592e-1, {[{At = 0., A1 = .5315345998, A2 = 0.9928747436e-1}, 0.2074929592e-1]}
What I need is fm(v) and A1(v), ... for which correspondening to fm(v).


Cristian
 

Attachments

Thanks for your reply. My problem is that all these variables are function of v. and I need to have the dependence A1(v),A2(v) and A3(v).
fm:=minimize(..., location=true) gives an array , but unfortunatley ,aple does not keep the order of the variables, every time is different.

For example:

fm[1] := 0.2075577438e-1, {[{A2 = 0.3304115674e-2, A3 = -.5155123546, A1 = 0.9409892271e-1}, 0.2075577438e-1]}
fm[2] := 0.2074929592e-1, {[{At = 0., A1 = .5315345998, A2 = 0.9928747436e-1}, 0.2074929592e-1]}
What I need is fm(v) and A1(v), ... for which correspondening to fm(v).


Cristian
 
A set in Maple uses {}'s while a list uses []'s, Maple will not keep the order of objects placed in sets (e.g., if, in Maple, you put Set:={a,b,c};, then Maple may display Set={c,a,b}, or any other arrangement as it pleases), but order is maintained in a list by Maple ((e.g., if, in Maple, you put List:=[a,b,c];, then Maple will always display List=[a,b,c]).
 
You might also try using the Minimize command in the Optimization package:

>with(Optimization);

>?Minimize

should get you started.
 
Thanks for the answers.


Cristian
 
Hello,

Meanwhile I was able to solve the problem.

The ouptput of fm:=minimize(..., location=true) is an array which contains the value of minima and a set like in the eq down.

fm[1] := 0.2075577438e-1, {[{A2 = 0.3304115674e-2, A3 = -.5155123546, A1 = 0.9409892271e-1}, 0.2075577438e-1]}

In fact the set {[{A2 = 0.3304115674e-2, A3 = -.5155123546, A1 = 0.9409892271e-1}, is not giving values to A1,A2,A3 is just the rule that those variables have to obey in oredr to have minima. The values can be extracted with the help of the command subs, like this

subs({[{A2 = 0.3304115674e-2, A3 = -.5155123546, A1 = 0.9409892271e-1},[A1,A2,A3]) .
The rule is applied to the variables.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top