Are physics-related math problems important in Calculus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Art_
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Physics-related math problems in calculus are often challenging due to a lack of foundational knowledge in physics rather than a deficiency in mathematical skills. Many students struggle with application problems because they are primarily trained to solve homework assignments and test problems, which are typically straightforward. Additionally, the wording of these problems can be unclear, leading to confusion and difficulty in identifying necessary assumptions. To improve problem-solving skills, it's recommended to revisit foundational concepts and seek resources that integrate physics with calculus. Understanding the relevant physics will significantly enhance the ability to tackle these types of problems effectively.
Art_
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am a college freshman and have taken Calculus I,II,III (covering derivatives, integrals, series and vectors) while going over my book during the summer I tried doing several problems from random chapters. Most of which were application or physics related. Most of these I was not able to solve. But while doing problems relating to the section or on the concept I have no problem and I remember how to do all of them and I'm very confident in all of the material.

So my question is how important are those types of problems (the physics type). In my opinion the reason I am not able to solve them is because of the lack of other knowledge (like physics) and not mathematical.
Thank You,
Art
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I have two opinions on this, as it comes up quite regularly. The first is that most of us struggle with doing problems that aren't assigned for homework or didn't cover in class. We are basically trained to do problems with the pressure that they're due for homework or we'll be tested over them. Also, the calculus sequences are often taught in a very standard, sequential way and don't branch out to actually explain things. They just teach us to solve certain problems and that's it. That's why we struggle with the word and application problems. The key to solving physics problems or word problems is to write down the relevant information, i.e. what the constants are, equations, relationships, etc.

My second opinion is that a lot of the applications or physics type problems I've seen in calculus textbooks are poorly worded. They don't give you enough information and expect certain assumptions that they don't always state. This makes those problems difficult, as there is usually some simple hang up.

In the end, don't sweat it too much. Try them again after re-reading some the preceding material. If you want to make sure you understand certain material, applications, or relevant physics, try finding a book that actually explains and teaches that material. This would be a better use of your time than wasting it on the usual calculus bricks.
 
Your Calculus textbook is not a Physic textbook, and so, if you not yet studied the relevant Physics, you could be confused about just how to translate the Calculus worded textbook exercise into the relevant mathematical symbolism and then solve the problem. This becomes far simpler and easier to handle after you study the relevant Physics.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top