Solving Momentum and Energy Equations for Elastic Collision | Help Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter vorcil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving simultaneous equations for an elastic collision using the conservation of momentum and energy. The user struggles to find the correct values for final velocities (Vf1 and Vf2) and receives guidance on isolating variables to simplify the equations. Despite attempts to solve for y in terms of x, the user continues to arrive at incorrect answers. Participants emphasize the importance of checking for physically realistic solutions when dealing with quadratic equations in collision problems. The conversation highlights the complexities of solving elastic collision equations and the need for careful consideration of the results.
vorcil
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
i used the conservation of momentum equation and conservation of energy equation

got m1.v1i + m2.v2i = m1.v1f + m2.v2f
and 1/2 m1 . v1i^2 + 1/2m2 . v2i^2 = 1/2 m1.v1f^2+ 1/2 m2.v2f^2

i know it's a simutaneous equation but i don't know how to solve it!

1.1 + 0 = 0.11 x + 0.3y
5.5 + 0 = 0.55x^2 + .15y^2

(this is for the elastic one)

http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/2373/masteringphysics.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
i used the conservation of momentum equation and conservation of energy equation

got m1.v1i + m2.v2i = m1.v1f + m2.v2f
and 1/2 m1 . v1i^2 + 1/2m2 . v2i^2 = 1/2 m1.v1f^2+ 1/2 m2.v2f^2

i know it's a simutaneous equation but i don't know how to solve it!

1.1 + 0 = 0.11 x + 0.3y
5.5 + 0 = 0.55x^2 + .15y^2

(this is for the elastic one)
 
anyone please?
 
vorcil said:
i know it's a simutaneous equation but i don't know how to solve it!

1.1 + 0 = 0.11 x + 0.3y
5.5 + 0 = 0.55x^2 + .15y^2
One way is to solve for y (in terms of x) in equation 1 and substitute that into equation 2. Then you'll have an equation with one unknown, which you can solve.
 
i got it wrong!
can someone show me how to do it please!

i solved Vf1 to be 3.153 ms^-1
vf2 to be 0.205 ms^-1

for the elastic collision
 
vorcil said:
i got it wrong!
Show exactly what you did. Start by showing how you solved for y in terms of x in the first equation.
 
Doc Al said:
Show exactly what you did. Start by showing how you solved for y in terms of x in the first equation.

1.1 + 0 = 0.11 x + 0.3y
5.5 + 0 = 0.55x^2 + .15y^2

5.5 = (0.55*x^2) + (0.15*((1.1-(0.11*x)-0.3)^2))
solving for x i got 3.15

y = 1.1 - (.11*x) -.3

y = .45

thanks for helping
 
vorcil said:
1.1 + 0 = 0.11 x + 0.3y
...
y = 1.1 - (.11*x) -.3
Correct this.
 
vorcil said:
omg lol i don't believe it

dude i still got the wrong awnser

is it y = 1.1 / ((0.11x)+0.3)
y = (1.1 + (0.11x)) /0.3?

i don't know what the hell is wrong with me this morning, it's 3 am now
 
  • #10
vorcil said:
dude i still got the wrong awnser

is it y = 1.1 / ((0.11x)+0.3)
y = (1.1 + (0.11x)) /0.3?
Not quite (almost). Try again.
vorcil said:
1.1 + 0 = 0.11 x + 0.3y
Solve this for y. Do it slowly, one step at a time.
 
  • #11
Doc Al said:
Not quite (almost). Try again.

Solve this for y. Do it slowly, one step at a time.

y = ( 1.1 - ( 0.11*X) ) / 0.3

i'm on my last try for this question, it's like high school all over again
just want to check with you before i go for my final attempt

5.5 = (0.55 * X^2) + (0.15 * ( ( ( 1.1 - (0.11*X ) ) / 0.3 ) ^2 ) )
 
  • #12
vorcil said:
y = ( 1.1 - ( 0.11*X) ) / 0.3
That's more like it.
 
  • #13
Doc Al said:
That's more like it.

I still managed to get it wrong,

V1f=2.85
V2f=2.62

2.85 was from the solved equation from above,
and v2f = (1.1-(.11*2.85))/0.3
 
  • #14
vorcil said:
I still managed to get it wrong,

V1f=2.85
V2f=2.62

2.85 was from the solved equation from above,
and v2f = (1.1-(.11*2.85))/0.3
When you solve a quadratic equation you get two solutions. Often, only one of the solutions will be physically realistic for a given problem. That's the case here. (Note that the solution that you chose has the first mass moving faster than the second, but in the same direction. How could that be possible unless the masses passed through each other?)

What's the other solution?
 
Back
Top