Solving Orbital Radius Problem: Reduce Radius by 1.09 km

  • Thread starter Thread starter jbot2222
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbital Radius
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a physics problem involving an astronaut in a space shuttle trying to catch up to a satellite by reducing their orbital radius by 1.09 km. Participants suggest equating gravitational force with centripetal force to determine angular velocity, noting that both the shuttle and satellite share the same angular velocity. The difference in speed due to the radius change is crucial for calculating the time it will take to reach the satellite. One user expresses confusion over their calculations and seeks clarification on the numerical values obtained by others. The conversation highlights the complexities of orbital mechanics and the importance of accurate calculations in such scenarios.
jbot2222
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
im not getting this problem AT ALL:

You are an astronaut in the space shuttle pursuing a satellite in need of repair. You find yourself in a circular orbit of the same radius as the satellite, but 30.7 km behind it. How long will it take to reach the satellite if you reduce your orbital radius by 1.09 km? You can assume the space shuttle has an orbit of 200 miles above the Earth's surface.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jbot2222 said:
im not getting this problem AT ALL:

You are an astronaut in the space shuttle pursuing a satellite in need of repair. You find yourself in a circular orbit of the same radius as the satellite, but 30.7 km behind it. How long will it take to reach the satellite if you reduce your orbital radius by 1.09 km? You can assume the space shuttle has an orbit of 200 miles above the Earth's surface.

Equate the gravitational force with the centripetal one and from there u should be able to find the angular velocity.
The speed difference between the shuttle and the satellite will result simply from the fact that both the shuttle and the satellite would move with the same angular velocity.
With the distance and the difference in speed,u should be able to find the time.

Daniel.
 
i tried it, but I am getting the wrong answer. wat numerical value did u get when u did it?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top