Solving partial differential equation numerically

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the self-teaching efforts to solve a first-order partial differential equation (PDE) numerically using finite differences. The user has defined the function f(x,y) = sin(x-y) and derived the PDE ∂f/∂x + ∂f/∂y = 0, along with boundary conditions. They have opted for centered differences with equal spacings in the x and y directions, leading to a discretized equation. However, upon constructing the matrix to solve the linear system, they encounter a singular matrix issue. The user seeks clarification on whether their setup is correct or if the numerical method is inappropriate for the first-order PDE. They also reference second-order PDEs related to circular drum vibrations, indicating a desire for insights into their first-order problem. The key concern is the singularity of the matrix and the validity of the numerical approach for the defined PDE.
Telemachus
Messages
820
Reaction score
30
Hi there. I am trying to self teach how to solve partial differential equations numerically using finite differences. I know this is a complex field, that requires much more knowledge of the theory than what I actually know, but anyway I wanted to try.

Anyway, I've tried to build my own differential equation, probably naively. I wanted to solve a first order partial differential equation, so I thought of taking the function:

##f(x,y)=sin(x-y)##

And then, taking derivatives I build the differential equation:

##\displaystyle \frac{\partial f(x,y)}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial f(x,y)}{\partial y}=0##, and I considered the interval ##0\leq x \leq 1, 0\leq y \leq 1##

Then I considered the boundary conditions ##f(0,y)=\sin(-y)##, ##f(1,y)=\sin(1-y)##,##f(x,0)=\sin(x)## and ##f(x,1)=\sin(x-1)##.I think that everything is correct until here, but I'm not sure, if anything is wrong please tell me.

Then I considered centered differences (I needed for centered difference to have the previous and forward steps in the equation, in order to propagate the solution from the boundaries). I've considered equal spacings in the y and x directions, with ##x_i=i\Delta x=ih##, ##y_j=j\Delta y=j h##, and ##h=\frac{1}{N+1}##, with N being the number of interior points in each axis, being ##(x_0,y_j),(x_{N+1},y_j)## and ##(x_i,y_0),(x_i,y_{N+1})## the points situated at the boundaries of the domain.

Under this conditions I've arrived to the set of equations:

##u_{i+1,j}-u_{i-1,j}+u_{i,j+1}-u_{i,j-1}=0##

Where I thought that ##u_{i,j}\sim f(x_i,y_j)##

Then the discretized version of the boundary conditions would look like: ##u_{0,j}=\sin(-jh)##, ##u_{N+1,j}=\sin(1-jh)##, ##u_{i,0}=\sin(ih)## and ##u_{i,N+1}=\sin(ih-1)##.

But when I build the matrix and solve the linear system I get the result that the matrix is singular. So what would be the correct approach to this problem?
 
Technology news on Phys.org
Yes, but those are second order. I was interested in solving a first order partial differential equation. Is anything wrong with the problem I set up? is it just that the numerical approach isn't proper for this equation or I did something else wrong?
 
Thread 'Is this public key encryption?'
I've tried to intuit public key encryption but never quite managed. But this seems to wrap it up in a bow. This seems to be a very elegant way of transmitting a message publicly that only the sender and receiver can decipher. Is this how PKE works? No, it cant be. In the above case, the requester knows the target's "secret" key - because they have his ID, and therefore knows his birthdate.
I tried a web search "the loss of programming ", and found an article saying that all aspects of writing, developing, and testing software programs will one day all be handled through artificial intelligence. One must wonder then, who is responsible. WHO is responsible for any problems, bugs, deficiencies, or whatever malfunctions which the programs make their users endure? Things may work wrong however the "wrong" happens. AI needs to fix the problems for the users. Any way to...
Back
Top