Solving Phasor Circuit: Finding Theta

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about solving a phasor circuit, the main focus is on finding the phase angle theta for the voltage across an inductor in a series circuit with an independent current source. The voltage is given as vL(t) = 3cos(wt + theta), and the impedance for the inductor is represented as Z = jwL. The relationship vL(t) = Z*I leads to the conclusion that the phase angle is 90 degrees, as the impedance is purely imaginary, resulting in an arctan of infinity. The conversation also touches on the use of textbooks in electrical engineering courses, specifically mentioning Nilsson and Riedel versus DeCarlo and Lin. Overall, the key takeaway is the understanding of how to derive the phase angle in phasor analysis.
EvLer
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
Hello,
now we are in phasors and I am missing something in this problem:
given a circuit of indep current source (5cos(wt)), R, L (with vL(t)) all in series, no values for them,
although voltage across inductor vL(t) = 3cos(wt + theta), we need to find theta.

So, by using impedance for L: Z = jwL, vL(t) = Z*I,
so I got vL(t) = jwL5 /_ 0 which is also = 3/_theta
And now what? The answer is 90 degrees, but how do I get it?

Thanks a lot.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The reason its 90 degrees is simple... the voltage is indeed ZI, and I has a phase of zero--- but you would do well to convince yourself that the impedance Z is purely imaginary, so you have a phase for your impedance equivalent to the arctan of Im[Z]/Re[Z] where Re[Z] = 0, and thus you have an arctan of infinity, which is undoubtedly equal to 90 degrees.

Therefore you have V = ZI which yields a phase of 0 + 90, the angular frequency and the amplitudes of Z and I are immaterial for this problem.
 
By the by, do you intro EE students still happen to make use of Nilsson and Riedel by any chance?
 
Theelectricchild said:
By the by, do you intro EE students still happen to make use of Nilsson and Riedel by any chance?
Huh?
I guess, not.

Thanks for reply!
 
Oh sorry, it's just a textbook that I found really great for my intro EE courses.
 
Theelectricchild said:
Oh sorry, it's just a textbook that I found really great for my intro EE courses.
Thanks, I might check it out as complementary source. We are using DeCarlo and Lin, since DeCarlo is actually a professor here, I doubt they will change our texbook any time soon :rolleyes:
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top