Solving Point Charge Impact Time on Grounded Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euclid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E&m Griffiths
Euclid
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
A point charge (q, mass m) is released from rest at a distance d from a grouned infinite conducting plane. How long does it take to hit the plane?
Answer pi*(d/q)*sqrt(2pi*eps m d)
This problem seemed easy to me at very, but it leads to a second order nonlinear equation
m\frac{d^2 z}{dt^2} = \frac{q^2}{16 \pi \epsilon_0 z^2}.

I tried using energy considerations to write v as v(z), I then solved for z as z(v), and integrated the above equation for v(t), putting in the limits 0 and infinity. This did not give the correct answer, although it appeared to be close. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't actually worked out the problem, so I'm not sure if the right side of your equation is correct. Just as a note incase you didn't do this - since the infinite conducting plane is grounded, you need to use the method of images to get your potential function.
 
Maple choked on the d.e. but, you should be able to show
v2 = 2c(1/z - 1/d) with c = q2/(16 Pi Eps0 m)
with conservation of energy or integrating the force equation once.
now to solve for time put solve for v and use the positive root,
the negative one leads to t<0.
thus t = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2c}} \int_d^0 \sqrt{ \frac{ dz}{ d - z}} \. d z
The substitution z = d cos2(theta) makes this doable.
 
Yeah, that's what I indicated I tried above. It appeared to fail the first time I did it, but the second time it worked out.
Thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top