Solving Projectiles: Kinematics Equations & Variables for Grade 12 Physics 12 BC

  • Thread starter Thread starter link2110
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectiles
AI Thread Summary
In projectile motion, the key to solving problems lies in separating the horizontal and vertical components of motion, as they are independent of each other. For the given problem involving a golf ball hit diagonally, the initial velocity must be broken down into horizontal (Vx) and vertical (Vy) components using trigonometry. The time to maximum height can be calculated using the vertical component and the acceleration due to gravity, which is -9.80 m/s². The equations of kinematics, such as V2 = V1 + at, can be applied to find maximum height and other variables. Understanding these principles allows for accurate calculations of projectile motion parameters.
link2110
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi I am a grade 12 student in Physics 12 in BC, and I was wondering for projectiles, what equations you use, and what variables you use to solve. For example, in our notes our teacher gave us and example and completed it for us, but I don’t get why he used the equations he did. I do know that you use kinematics equations, and you have to change the initial velocity of the object into its 2 components Vy and Vx using component method, but other than that I don’t get why you use an equation and not another one.

Here is the problem, and any help at all would be appreciated.


A golf ball is hit diagonally (37o) off the top of a 15m cliff at 40m/s.

Find:
a) Time to max height
b) Max height achieved
c) Entire time in air
d) Range
e) Velocity at 1.0 seconds
f) Velocity at impact


Here is the picture that I drew to start.

http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/556/physicsquestion.th.png

Then I found the Vx and the Vy.

http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/1953/physicsquestion1.th.png

Now I'm stuck to find the first thing...because I don't know how to get it.
Help please?




The answers to the question are:
a) 2.46 sec
b) 44.6 m
c) 5.47 sec
d) 175 m
e) 35.0 m/s @ 24.1o above horizontal
f) (do not have b/c notes are incomplete)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The key to these problems is in the assumption that each independent dimension of motion is unaffected by the other. That is to say, if, parallel to the x-axis, the ball has no horizontal acceleration, then you can use kinematics equations assuming that the ball has no acceleration and get the correct horizontal component of the ball's velocity irrespective of what is going on in the y-direction. The same holds for the y-component analysis.

So if we look at question a) [time to max height], realize that the height of the ball has nothing to do with the horizontal velocity of the ball, and thus we need only know the y-component of the velocity and whether the ball is accelerating in that component. Use trigonometry to get vy and note that the acceleration in y is -g, where g is the scalar acceleration due to gravity at sea level. In the y-direction, the projectile is simply going up and down, just as if you were to throw it straight up with velocity vy without any horizontal component. You should already know the proper equation for this setup from your study of one-dimensional kinematics.
 
slider142 said:
Use trigonometry to get vy and note that the acceleration in y is -g, where g is the scalar acceleration due to gravity at sea level. In the y-direction,

so I am assuming that's -9.80 m/s - accelleration due to gravity.

then i'd use an equation just like the ones in kinematics where the ball is thrown straight up (V2= V1 + at), and assume that at V2, the max height the velocity of the ball is 0m/s. the V1 is the inital accell of the ball, which is the Vy. Am i right?
 
link2110 said:
so I am assuming that's -9.80 m/s - accelleration due to gravity.

then i'd use an equation just like the ones in kinematics where the ball is thrown straight up (V2= V1 + at), and assume that at V2, the max height the velocity of the ball is 0m/s. the V1 is the inital accell of the ball, which is the Vy. Am i right?

Sounds good! :smile: You will also need an equation involving distance, as you need height.
 
how do you find the max height?
 
Use an equation relating distance to acceleration and time. Find the time it takes for the object to decelerate to 0 using the equation you gave before. When it reaches 0 velocity it has attained its maximum height and will start falling (negative velocity).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top