dhris
- 80
- 0
Hi, I'm hoping someone out there is going to see something in this problem that I don't because I really don't get it:
Consider the equation:
<br /> \sigma=(\omega + i \nu k^2)+\frac{\alpha^2}{\omega + i \eta k^2}<br />
It doesn't really matter what the variables mean, (i^2=-1 of course) but what I really need is to figure out \omega, which is complex, as a function of the rest (under a certain approximation). The book I found this in claims that under the following conditions:
<br /> |\sigma|>>|\alpha|<br />
as well as some vague statement about \nu, \eta being small, the two roots of the quadratic are:
<br /> \omega \approx -i \nu k^2 + \sigma + \frac{\alpha^2}{\sigma + i(\eta-\nu)k^2}<br />
and
<br /> \omega \approx -i \eta k^2 - \frac{\alpha^2}{\sigma}<br />
I don't know how they came up with this, but it would be really great to find out. Anybody have any ideas?
Thanks,
dhris
Consider the equation:
<br /> \sigma=(\omega + i \nu k^2)+\frac{\alpha^2}{\omega + i \eta k^2}<br />
It doesn't really matter what the variables mean, (i^2=-1 of course) but what I really need is to figure out \omega, which is complex, as a function of the rest (under a certain approximation). The book I found this in claims that under the following conditions:
<br /> |\sigma|>>|\alpha|<br />
as well as some vague statement about \nu, \eta being small, the two roots of the quadratic are:
<br /> \omega \approx -i \nu k^2 + \sigma + \frac{\alpha^2}{\sigma + i(\eta-\nu)k^2}<br />
and
<br /> \omega \approx -i \eta k^2 - \frac{\alpha^2}{\sigma}<br />
I don't know how they came up with this, but it would be really great to find out. Anybody have any ideas?
Thanks,
dhris
Last edited: