Solving Radioactive Decay Mix-Up & Calculating Half-Life

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the relationship between the decay rate (R) and activity (A) in radioactive decay, confirming that they are essentially the same but expressed in different units. Both equations, R=R_0e^{-λt} and A=A_0e^{-λt}, represent the decay process, with activity defined as the rate of decay of the number of nuclei. To calculate half-life, the equation N(t)=N_0e^{-λt} is used, solving for t when N(t)=N/2. The derivation of the activity formula from the number of nuclei is confirmed as correct, leading to A(t)=A_0e^{-λt}. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately discussing radioactive decay and its implications.
FaraDazed
Messages
347
Reaction score
2
This isn't a direct question and answer problem, it relates to an essay I am doing.

I am a bit confused on the equations given by my tutor for radioactive decay, I suspect there is a mix up of symbols used where two symbols are used for the same think (such as N and R for the normal force).

On the powerpoint relating to it, she stated that the decay rate, R, is as below
<br /> R=R_0e^{-λt} <br />

However I also have the formula below
<br /> A=A_0e^{-λt}<br />

Are they the same thing, I understand that the second one is the activity, measured in Bq, but also the first one?

Also if I were to calculate the half-life of something, which formula would I use?

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are the same thing. Radioactivity is a manifestation of decay, any decayed atom emits some particle that is registered as radioactivity. So one is proportional to another, and the coefficient depends on the units used to measure these two quantities.
 
The activity is defined as the variation in time of the number of nuclei, and is also proportional to the number itself
$$ A=-\frac{\mathrm{d}N}{\mathrm{d}t}=\lambda N $$
Solving this equation you have immediately
$$ N(t)=N_0e^{-\lambda t}=N_0e^{-t/\tau} $$
where ##\tau=1/\lambda## is the mean lifetime (you find it tabulated).
Now clearly then
$$ A(t)=\lambda N(t) $$
and your result is there.

As for the ##R## I think it is more or less the same thing, eventually expressed as different units, but essentially has the same meaning.

Last of all, to compute the half-life, compute ##t## for which you have ##N(t)=N/2##
 
tia89 said:
Solving this equation you have immediately
$$ N(t)=N_0e^{-\lambda t}

Yeah I have seen that one as well with N, I know N stands for the number of Nuclei though is it the same as well then?

I need to derive it and end up with the one using A, would the below be ok? (i don't think it is)

<br /> A=\frac{dN}{dt}=-λt \\<br /> ∫\frac{1}{N}dN=∫-λdt \\<br /> e^{logN}=e^{-λt} \\<br /> ∴A=A_0e^{-λt}<br />

Any help is appreciated.
 
First solve
$$ \frac{\mathrm{d}N}{\mathrm{d}t}=-\lambda N $$
exactly as you did
$$ \int_{N_0}^{N(t)}\frac{\mathrm{d}N}{N}=-\int_{0}^{t}\lambda \mathrm{d}t $$
$$ \ln\left[ \frac{N(t)}{N_0} \right]=-\lambda t $$
$$ N(t)=N_0 e^{-\lambda t} $$

Then after that you have by definition ##A=\lambda N## (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_decay#Radioactive_decay_rates) and therefore
$$ A(t)=\lambda N_0 e^{-\lambda t}=A_0 e^{-\lambda t} $$
calling ##A_0=\lambda N_0## (by definition).
 
tia89 said:
First solve
$$ \frac{\mathrm{d}N}{\mathrm{d}t}=-\lambda N $$
exactly as you did
$$ \int_{N_0}^{N(t)}\frac{\mathrm{d}N}{N}=-\int_{0}^{t}\lambda \mathrm{d}t $$
$$ \ln\left[ \frac{N(t)}{N_0} \right]=-\lambda t $$
$$ N(t)=N_0 e^{-\lambda t} $$

Then after that you have by definition ##A=\lambda N## (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_decay#Radioactive_decay_rates) and therefore
$$ A(t)=\lambda N_0 e^{-\lambda t}=A_0 e^{-\lambda t} $$
calling ##A_0=\lambda N_0## (by definition).

Many thanks, appreciate it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top