Solving Rational Functions: Rewriting Equation to Get R(z)=...

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on rewriting a rational function equation to express it in the form R(z) = quotient x divisor. It emphasizes that R(z) is a product of the roots (z - a_j) and the quotient S_j(z), which represents the rational function. Clarification is provided that the rational function is indeed a quotient of two polynomials, specifically P(z) and Q(z). The transformation from one equation to another involves manipulating the terms to achieve a common denominator. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately rewriting the rational function.
Ratzinger
Messages
291
Reaction score
0
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/CPlace.html, how do I rewrite (2) to get the third equation R(z)=... ?

thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
remember the rational function will produce a quotient, which when multiplied by the divisor will yeild the original R(z). So the second expression is in the form R(z) = quotient x divisor.

More specifically (z-a_j)^uj X S_j(z) .. Where as they said S_j(z) is the rational fuction ( which was the quotient ). It is not that much about "deriving" the third form but more showing that the complex function R(z) is a product of the number of roots ( z-a_j) and the quotient S_j(z).

My 2 cents - correct if neccesary.
 
Last edited:
thanks for answering!

But what do you mean by qoutient produced by a rational function? The rational is a quotient of two polynomials, so what quotient is it producing?
 
Take
<br /> S_j(z) = \frac{a_0(z-\alpha_1)^{\mu_1}(z-\alpha_2)^{\mu_2}\cdots(z-\alpha_{j - 1})^{\mu_{j - 1}}(z-\alpha_{j + 1})^{\mu_{j + 1}}\cdots(z-\alpha_r)^{\mu_r}} {b_0(z-\beta_1)^{\nu_1}(z-\beta_2)^{\nu_2}\ldots(z-\beta_s)^{\nu_s}},<br />
:smile:
 
The equation labled (3) is not derived directly from equation (2). What they have done is write the product of all terms in the numerator of (2) as P(z) and the product of all terms in the denominator as Q(z):
R(z)= P(z)/Q(z).

Then they look at R(z)- c= P(z)/Q(z)- c. Getting the common denominator (Q(z)) you have P(z)/Q(z)- cQ(z)/Q(z)= (P(z)- cQ(z))/Q(z)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Back
Top