Solving RC Circuit Problem Homework

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a homework problem related to an RC circuit with a capacitor and resistors. For part (a), the initial charge on the capacitor is calculated based on the voltage across it, which is influenced by the resistors in the circuit rather than the full battery voltage. The participants clarify that after a long time, the capacitor reaches a steady-state voltage determined by the voltage drop across the resistors, not the battery voltage. For part (b), the time for the capacitor's charge to decrease to 10% of its initial value involves using the exponential decay formula related to RC circuits. Understanding the voltage across the capacitor in relation to the circuit configuration is crucial for solving both parts of the problem.
majormaaz
Messages
61
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider the circuit in the figure below, in which V = 85 V, R = 40 , and the switch has been closed for a very long time.

p31-77alt.gif


(a) What's the charge on the capacitor?
(b) The switch is opened at t = 0 s. At what time has the charge on the capacitor decreased to 10% of its initial value?

[Here's the link for the picture if it doesn't come up]
http://www.webassign.net/knight/p31-77alt.gif

Homework Equations


C = Q/V
V = IR
Q = C*EMF*e^(-t/RC)

The Attempt at a Solution



For part (a), I thought that since the circuit's been connected like that for a long time, the voltage across the capacitor would be the same as the battery's voltage - i.e. 85 Volts. From there, a simple Q = CV would yield 1.7 e -4 C = 170 μC, but that's not right.

For part (b), I was thinking that since it's a parallel circuit, I'd have to use Kirchoff's Law and the Loop Rule to get those 2 loop equations and the Junction equation, but I'm not sure as to if there's another method to get to the answer.

I would appreciate any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
majormaaz said:

Homework Statement


Consider the circuit in the figure below, in which V = 85 V, R = 40 , and the switch has been closed for a very long time.

p31-77alt.gif


(a) What's the charge on the capacitor?
(b) The switch is opened at t = 0 s. At what time has the charge on the capacitor decreased to 10% of its initial value?

[Here's the link for the picture if it doesn't come up]
http://www.webassign.net/knight/p31-77alt.gif

Homework Equations


C = Q/V
V = IR
Q = C*EMF*e^(-t/RC)

The Attempt at a Solution



For part (a), I thought that since the circuit's been connected like that for a long time, the voltage across the capacitor would be the same as the battery's voltage - i.e. 85 Volts. From there, a simple Q = CV would yield 1.7 e -4 C = 170 μC, but that's not right.

For part (b), I was thinking that since it's a parallel circuit, I'd have to use Kirchoff's Law and the Loop Rule to get those 2 loop equations and the Junction equation, but I'm not sure as to if there's another method to get to the answer.

I would appreciate any help!
(The image shows up just fine!)

For part (a):
After a long time, the capacitor is fully charged, so no current flows through it or the 10Ω resistor. So there is 0 voltage drop across the 10Ω resistor.

However, current does flow through the 60Ω and 40Ω (R) resistors. Thus they act as a voltage splitter, and C is in parallel with R .​
 
SammyS said:
However, current does flow through the 60Ω and 40Ω (R) resistors. Thus they act as a voltage splitter, and C is in parallel with R .

I think you're saying that the voltage across C would be the same potential difference as the voltage drop across resistor R. But I don't get how that would work if the capacitor was fully charged - I mean, after a long time, I can see why there'd be no current in that branch, but wouldn't the capacitor have charged up to the voltage of the battery by then (and not the resistor)?
 
Thanks for the help! I did get both answers with your help, but I'd still like to understand why the capacitor would charge up to (I)*40 Ω instead of the full battery voltage.
 
majormaaz said:
I think you're saying that the voltage across C would be the same potential difference as the voltage drop across resistor R. But I don't get how that would work if the capacitor was fully charged - I mean, after a long time, I can see why there'd be no current in that branch, but wouldn't the capacitor have charged up to the voltage of the battery by then (and not the resistor)?

The potential difference across the capacitor cannot go higher than the potential difference available at the nodes where it connects.

To find the steady-state potential that a capacitor will achieve, remove the capacitor from the circuit and find the open-circuit voltage at the open terminals where it was connected.
 
gneill said:
The potential difference across the capacitor cannot go higher than the potential difference available at the nodes where it connects.

To find the steady-state potential that a capacitor will achieve, remove the capacitor from the circuit and find the open-circuit voltage at the open terminals where it was connected.

I will keep this in mind. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top