Solving response surface for 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter JT14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Response Surface
JT14
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've done a response surface analysis, resulting in an equation of the form:

P= A + B*X + C*X^2 + D*Y + E*Y^2 + F*X*Y

Where A,B,C,D,E, and F are known values.

I want to rearrange the equation so I can get a polynomial describing when P=0, but I'm stuck.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,

Jono
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your equation is a quadratic form. You generally will not be able to solve it in the form y = f(x). Such an equation (with P = 0) describes a conic section (ellipses, hypberbolas, etc).

See this wikipedia page for details about how to identify which conic section your equation gives you.
 
I see... So I guess I need to re-think how I've done things.

I have a bunch of bacteria growth rates at different temperatures and water levels, and want to whack a curve on it that describes the boundary between growth and no growth for x (temp) and y(water). I've been playing around with response surfaces and binary logistic regressions, but I can't figure out how to get the resulting equations to give me an y=f(x) that describes the boundary.

Thanks for your help, it has been very useful.

J.
 
Why does the boundary have to be a function? Couldn't there be regions of growth and non-growth that are bounded by curves that can't be described by a form y = f(x)?

If you plot P(x,y) = 0 (e.g., using the contour-plot in Mathematica), what does the curve look like given your numbers A...E? Depending on your constants, it could be possible that the resulting curve could be described by a function for x > 0 and y > 0. For example, the curve

(x-2)^2 + y^2 = 4

is a conic section, and obviously a circle. You can't solve it exactly as y = f(x), although you can split it into two functions: y = \pm \sqrt{4-(x-2)^2}. In this case, if you only care about x > 0, y > 0, you only need the y = + \sqrt{4-(x-2)^2} solution.

Depending on your parameters, something similar could happen for your case, but in general it won't. However, again, I'm not sure why your boundary must be a function y = f(x)?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
944
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top