Solving Rotational Motion Problem Involving Mass and Length of Rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a rotational motion problem involving a thin rod and a clay ball. Participants suggest calculating the moment of inertia (Iz) by summing the moments of inertia of the individual components around the pivot point, rather than using the parallel axis theorem, which some find overly complicated. For the angle (Θ) the beam rises after the collision, conservation of angular momentum is proposed as a method to relate the initial and final states. The conversation emphasizes the need to connect rotational kinetic energy with potential energy at the angle Θ. The overall focus is on applying principles of physics to derive the necessary calculations for the problem.
Poisonous
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I ran across this problem studying for my exam, and I'm not sure how to solve it:

Homework Statement



A thin rod of Mass M and length L is supported by a pivot a distance of L/4 from its left end. A second support a distance 3L/4 from the left end prevents it from falling. A clay ball of mass M/2 drops from a height H above the beam, strikes the left end and completely sticks to the rod. The beam swings upward to make an angle \Theta with the horizontal.


a. Calculate the moment of Inertia, Iz, of the beam and clay ball together around the pivot point, after the clay sticks to the beam.


b. Calculate the angle \Theta to which the beam rises. Express your answer in terms of \omega, V, and/or Iz.


The Attempt at a Solution



For a, I was thinking of finding the moment of Inertia at the new center of mass after the ball sticks, then using the parallel axis theorem to get Iz, but that seems too messy..

For b, I think there must be some way to do it with energy conservation, but I really don't know where to start.

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Poisonous! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and an omega: ω :wink:)
Poisonous said:
a. Calculate the moment of Inertia, Iz, of the beam and clay ball together around the pivot point, after the clay sticks to the beam.

For a, I was thinking of finding the moment of Inertia at the new center of mass after the ball sticks, then using the parallel axis theorem to get Iz, but that seems too messy..

That's far too complicated …

just calculate the moment of inertia of the whole (about the pivot) as the sum of the moments of inertia of its parts. :wink:
For b, I think there must be some way to do it with energy conservation, but I really don't know where to start.

How can energy be conserved? It's a perfectly inelastic collision (the two final velocities are the same).

You can use conservation of energy after the collision, but for the collision itself, you need … ? :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Poisonous! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and an omega: ω :wink:)


That's far too complicated …

just calculate the moment of inertia of the whole (about the pivot) as the sum of the moments of inertia of its parts. :wink:


How can energy be conserved? It's a perfectly inelastic collision (the two final velocities are the same).

You can use conservation of energy after the collision, but for the collision itself, you need … ? :smile:


For a: Iz = 1/12ML2 + (M/2)(L/4)2

right?

For b: For the collision itself you would need conservation of angular momentum? So,

Iclay * ωclay + 0 = Iz * ωz

so, ωz = MVL/8Iz

So you know the rotational kinetic energy at the beginning, and that it should be all potential energy at the point of \theta, but how do you relate the energies with \theta?

Thanks for the help.
 
Last edited:
Poisonous said:
For a: Iz = 1/12ML2 + (M/2)(L/4)2

No, 1/12 would be at the end, you want L/4 from the end.
So you know the rotational kinetic energy at the beginning, and that it should be all potential energy at the point of \theta, but how do you relate the energies with \theta?

(what happened to that θ i gave you? :wink:)

You relate θ to h. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top