Solving Satellite Orbit & Eccentric Anomaly Calculations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the period of a satellite orbiting Earth using various formulas, with the user confirming a period of approximately 19 hours from two formulas. They seek clarification on transforming the first formula into the second and third, and inquire about the meaning of Re, which is identified as the Earth's radius. Additionally, they express confusion over calculating the time of periapse passage, noting an incorrect result and questioning the relationship between this time and the orbital period. The conversation emphasizes the importance of specifying units for all values used in calculations to avoid confusion.
Cassius1n
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi, everyone!
I'm trying to find the period of a satellite orbiting the Earth by the next formulas
with: miu= 398600.5;
a=36770.48 km;
I. 2*pi*(a^3/miu)^1/2
II. 84.489*(a/Re)^(3/2)min
III. 0.00016587*a^(3/2)min
And I got aprox. 19 hours from both formulas (I. and III.) which is correct.
Can anyone please explain to me how do you get from the first formula to the second and third,what transformations should I make and also who is Re?

Another problem that I have is that I'm trying to get from cartesian system to orbital and I have reached a point where I have to:
Compute the time of periapse passage, T (note that EA must be in radians), with the formula

T=t-(1/n)*(EA-ecc*sin(EA));
where EA=eccentric anomaly=0.0335
ecc=eccentricity=0.80324;
n=sqrt(miu/a^3);
I have taken t=270;
With the following result:-73.7766 which I know is bad but I don't know where I've done wrong.Can anyone explain to me ,please?
Also, Is this time the same as the period?

 

Attachments

  • orbital.png
    orbital.png
    10.8 KB · Views: 530
  • orbital.png
    orbital.png
    11.9 KB · Views: 591
Physics news on Phys.org
That is a weird and inconsistent way to handle units.

Re should be the radius of Earth.

You can just plug in numbers, then the formulas can be converted into each other. (I) is the one closest to the derivation via the forces on a satellite.
As an easier example: You can rewrite "10*x" as "5*b*x" if you define b=2. If you have Re=6370, you can get it into formulas in the same way. Sometimes that makes the formula handier.For the second problem I think something is missing. Time relative to what? Where do the orbital parameters come from?
 
ctk1.jpg
ctk2.jpg
ctk3.jpg

First of all, thank you for your response, it has been very helpful.As for the second problem I've written the above MATLAB code. It uses the values of position vector and velocity vector to determine the orbital elements.As you can see the values for a and e and other elements are correct so I believe that t is the moment in time at which those values for the vectors.For my code I've use the above steps.
 
Your images have too low resolution to read. Rather than screen or window dumps, a better tool is the Windows Snipping Tool which allows you to select and capture portions of the screen. Code can be cut and pasted as text (use code tags to surround it in order to preserve formatting). The best way to present equations is to use LaTeX syntax, which will automatically be rendered properly as equations. See the LaTeX guide: https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/
 
t=270;
miu= 398600.5;
Position values
Rx=1.120260101155629e+03;
Ry=-5.997082966407411e+03;
Rz=-3.919879916453886e+03;
Rxyz=[Rx Ry Rz];
Velocity values
Vx=5.0702;
Vy=4.9659;
Vz=-6.9805;
Vxyz=[Vx Vy Vz];
Angular momentum
hez = cross(Rxyz,Vxyz);
N = cross([0,0,1],hez);
hx=hez(1,1);
hy=hez(1,2);
hz=hez(1,3);
he=((hx^2)+(hy^2)+(hz^2))^(1/2)

R=((Rx^2)+(Ry^2)+(Rz^2))^(1/2); radius
Vel=((Vx^2)+(Vy^2)+(Vz^2))^(1/2);speed
E=((Vel^2)/2)-(miu/R);%Energy
ac= -(miu/(2*E)); semi-major axis
Excentricity e
e_vec = ((norm(Vxyz)^2 - miu/norm(Rxyz))*Rxyz - dot(Rxyz,Vxyz)*Vxyz)/miu;
ecc = norm(e_vec);
Inclination
inc=acos(hz/he);
ig=radtodeg(inc); in degree
Omega
OM=atan2(hx , -hy);
if N(2) < 0 quadrant check;
OM = 2*pi - OM;
end
OMg=radtodeg(OM)%OMEGA in degree;

True anomaly
tra=acos((ac*(1-ecc^2)-R)/(ecc*R));
if dot(Rxyz,Vxyz) < 0 quadrant check;
tra = 2*pi - tra;
end
trag=radtodeg(tra) ; in degree

Argument of periapse w
om= acos(dot(N,e_vec)/(norm(N)*ecc));
if e_vec(3) < 0 quadrant check;
om = 2*pi - om;
end
omg=radtodeg(om); in degree

Eccentric anomaly
EA=acos((ecc+cos(tra))/(1+ecc*cos(tra)));

The time of periapse passage
n=sqrt(miu/ac^3);
T0=t-(1/n)*(EA-ecc*sin(EA))
The values for the vector are from T=70172.6768628;%Period
and t=270; Those values I've use when I've done the conversion from orbital to cartesian and the output was the values of the 2 vectors.
Based on the following images. Sorry for the poor quality of the above images!
 

Attachments

  • ctk4.jpg
    ctk4.jpg
    24 KB · Views: 430
  • ctk4.jpg
    ctk4.jpg
    24 KB · Views: 389
  • ctk5.jpg
    ctk5.jpg
    16 KB · Views: 393
  • ctk6.jpg
    ctk6.jpg
    30.3 KB · Views: 410
gneill said:
Your images have too low resolution to read. Rather than screen or window dumps, a better tool is the Windows Snipping Tool which allows you to select and capture portions of the screen. Code can be cut and pasted as text (use code tags to surround it in order to preserve formatting). The best way to present equations is to use LaTeX syntax, which will automatically be rendered properly as equations. See the LaTeX guide: https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/
Gneill, thank you for the advice, I didn't know about the LaTeX!
 
You should state the units associated with your given values, position and velocity vector components included. Numbers alone are mostly meaningless.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
gneill said:
You should state the units associated with your given values, position and velocity vector components included. Numbers alone are mostly meaningless.
Sorry for that. For position and a we have km and for velocity km/s while T and t are in seconds.
 
Back
Top