Solving Satellite Speed Problem: Draw Path for Faster & Slower Orbits

  • Thread starter Thread starter impendingChaos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellite
AI Thread Summary
When a satellite's speed deviates from the correct velocity for a circular orbit, its path will adjust accordingly. If the satellite is moving faster than the correct speed, it will initially follow a path that forms an ellipse around the correct circular orbit before returning to it. Conversely, if the satellite is slower, it will trace an elliptical path that is inside the correct orbit. The discussion emphasizes that the type of orbit is influenced by the satellite's total mechanical energy and its radial speed being zero at the point of consideration. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately depicting the satellite's trajectory.
impendingChaos
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When a satellite is at the desired altitude over the equator or Jupiter its velocity has the correst direction but the speed is (a) slightly faster that the correct speed for a circular orbit of the radius and (b) is slighly slower than the correct speed for a circular orbit of the radius

The question then offers two spheres to represent the planet and the path if the satellite had the proper speed, one must now draw the new path of the satellite for both cases.


The Attempt at a Solution



I believe that in instance (a), the path would be greater from the accepted path of the sattellite with proper speed, for a time, but would then return to the original path of the correct sattelite speed once it has circled the planet due to gravity, forming an ellipse around the circular orbit of the correctly sped satellite.

I feel the same will happen for instance (b) except the ellipse will form inside the path for a satellite of the correct speed.

My friends believe this is incorrect and the sattelite will (a) spiral away from the planet outwards (away form the correct path) and (b) spiral inwards (inside the correct path)

Simply need some hint to help me justify which is correct.
Thx.
C.N.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Planetary (and satellite) motions are generally descibed by conic sections. Which type of orbit it follows is determined by the total mechanical energy of the satellite. The other fact to consider is that its radial speed is zero at the point in consideration. This suggests that the satellite will be at the symmetrical point of the orbit, eg. if it is an elliptical orbit it will either be at aphelion or perihelion.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top