Solving Scalar Line Integral with Vector {\bf{u}}

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the line integral of the vector function {\bf u}(x,y) over a contour defined by parametric equations. The integral is expressed in terms of the dot product and converted into a standard integral using the contour's parameters. It is noted that the vector function is radially directed, making the integral zero by inspection, although this approach may not be acceptable for a formal solution. Participants clarify how to express the terms in the integral, particularly how x^2 + y^2 simplifies to a^2 using trigonometric identities. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding the relationship between the vector function and the contour for proper evaluation of the integral.
jimmy42
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I have the vector:

{\bf{u}}(x,y) = \frac{{x{\bf{i}} + y{\bf{j}}}}{{{x^2} + {y^2}}}

Where:

x = a\cos t y = a\sin t

I know I need to use the equation

\int\limits_0^{2\pi } {{\bf{u}} \cdot d{\bf{r}}}

And the answer is

\int\limits_0^{2\pi } {} ((a\cos t/{a^2})( - a\sin t) + (a\sin t/{a^2})(a\cos t)dt = 0

The trouble I have is finding that {d{\bf{r}}} How is that done? Can someone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by actually stating the question correctly.

For the given vector function {\bf u}(x,y), evaluate the line integral,

I = ~_\mathbb{C} \!\!\! \int {\bf u} \cdot d {\bf r}

Where \mathbb{C} is a contour given parametrically by {x = a\cos t, y = a\sin t : t = 0 \ldots 2\pi}.
 
Last edited:
d {\bf r} is the vector differential <dx, dy>. So, using nothing but the definition of the dot product, the integral can be expanded as:

I = ~_\mathbb{C} \!\!\! \int u_x(x,y) \, dx + u_y(x,y) dy \,

At this point it is still a line integral over a specified contour, but we can use the parametric equations of the contour to express it as a "normal" integral over 0 to 2 pi. That is:

I = \int_0^{2 \pi} \left( u_x(t) \frac{dx}{dt} + u_y(t) \frac{dy}{dt} \right) \, dt

Does that help?
 
BTW. There's one other thing that you should notice about this question. It obvious that the vector function, x{\bf \, i} + y{\bf \, j}, is radially directed, and therefore at every point is perpendicular to the given contour. So we could actually state that the integral is zero by inspection.

At this point however I'd guess that your teacher doesn't want you to do it that way. :smile:
 
Thanks uart, that helps a lot. I was thinking along those lines but couldn't make it fit. What about that

{x^2}

How does that become?

{a^2}

Thanks.
 
What "x^2" are you talking about? The only x^2 in your integral is part of x^2+ y^2. On the circle of radius a, x^2+ y^2=a^2cos^2(t)+ a^2 sin^2 t= a^2(cos^2(t)+ sin^2(t))= a^2.
 
jimmy42 said:
{x^2}

How does that become?

{a^2}

It doesn't. However, x^2 + y^2 does become a^2. That's a simple trig identity, can you see it?
 
Did you find dr yet? Did you take the dot product?
 
Yes thanks uart, I see how it's all working now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K