Solving Second Moment of Area for Beam w/ Missing Circle

  • Thread starter Thread starter ganondorf29
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Moment
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
ganondorf29
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm having a problem calculating the I value for this beam. I'm not sure on how to account for the missing circle in the front square and how to account for the beam changing from a 1" x 1" square to a 5" x 0.5" beam


Homework Equations



Ixx = bh^12/12

The centroid of the beam is around x = 2.89711 in

The thickness of the beam is the same and so is it's density


The Attempt at a Solution



Here is a picture of the beam


**If there was no missing circle, could I just add I_square + I_rect = I_total? **
 

Attachments

  • beam.jpg
    beam.jpg
    9.1 KB · Views: 516
Physics news on Phys.org
ganondorf29 said:

The Attempt at a Solution



Here is a picture of the beam


**If there was no missing circle, could I just add I_square + I_rect = I_total? **


First thing, just get I for the square (with no hole in it) and then subtract the I for a cylinder. That will give you the I for the shape.

Second thing: The I that you get will be about its own centroid, not the centroid of the beam. So you need apply parallel axis theorem for the square (with the hole) and the rectangular section before you add them up.
 
Do you want the I about the x-axis, or the y-axis? If about the x-axis, the parallel axis theorem as suggested by rockfreak does not apply. You made a mistake in your formula for Ixx in post #1. Can you see what the error is?
 
rock.freak667 said:
First thing, just get I for the square (with no hole in it) and then subtract the I for a cylinder. That will give you the I for the shape.

Second thing: The I that you get will be about its own centroid, not the centroid of the beam. So you need apply parallel axis theorem for the square (with the hole) and the rectangular section before you add them up.


EDIT: Pongo is right, forget my parallel axis thing, I keep substituting I with J.