Solving Snooker Ball Physics Problem: u^2(m-M)=v^2(M+m)

  • Thread starter Thread starter alias25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem related to the elastic collision of two snooker balls, where one ball with mass m and velocity u collides with a stationary ball of mass M. Participants analyze the equations derived from conservation of momentum and energy, aiming to express the relationship between the velocities after the collision. A key point raised is the misunderstanding of using a negative sign for velocity, which can complicate the calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying algebraic manipulation to reach the desired equation. Ultimately, the participants encourage each other to persist in their physics studies despite initial difficulties.
alias25
Messages
197
Reaction score
0
snooker ball moving with mass m and vel u collides with stationary ball M, after collision m rebounds and moves with v vel. and M moves velocity V, if collision is elastic show that
v = ((M-m)/(M+m))multipliedby u rearrange this u get..v(M+m) = u(M-m)

using conservation laws i got (and I've taken the final vel of m as a negitive value (-v))

mu^2 = MV^2 - mv^2 (got that from E = 1/2mv^2)

and

mu = MV - mv (conservation of momentum

then I've rearranged the first equation for V and subbed it into the second
i ended up with a similar equation to the one they asked, i got

u^2(m - M) = v^2 (M + m)

i don't kno how to get rid of the squares or change (m -M) to (M-m)
did i approach the question right or is there something in the statement "if collision is elastic" that i havnt picked up on?

anyone here think i shouldn't be considering taking physics at uni if i can't do a question like this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a very general question. That makes it a hard one for a beginner. Don't let it get you down.

You are wrong to assume that v is negative. Throwing that minus sign in there will skew your final answers and get you nothing. The negative is a directional indicator - all you're saying with it is that the speed you end up with is in the opposite direction from what actually happens. To put it another way, it is physically possible for v to be in either the same direction as V or in the opposite direction. Putting the minus sign in just clouds the issue.

Getting rid of that extraneous minus sign will actually solve your problem. Just remember that (u^2 - v^2) factors. To get the actual form you need, you'll have to multiply some things out and group similar terms.
 
so i have (u^2-v^2) factorises to (u+v)(u-v)

but i end up with M(u+v)(u-v) = m(u+v)(u-v)

they cancel and i end up with m = M
thats wrong

i can rearrange the equation that I am looking for again to
Mv +mv = Mu - mu
- > mv + mu = Mu - Mv
--> m(v+u) = M (u -v)

which is similar to the equation i ended up with but mine cancelsss.
 
Last edited:
anyone here think i shouldn't be considering taking physics at uni if i can't do a question like this?

I'm in my fourth year and can't do most of the school questions. Even the "simple" ones seem hard if you don't practise occasionally.

i can rearrange the equation that I am looking for again to
Mv +mv = Mu - mu
- > mv + mu = Mu - Mv
--> m(v+u) = M (u -v)

rearrange that and that's what you're trying to get isn't it?

btw I'd agree with Diane about not usually assuming the direction of the moving ball after impact, but if it says rebound in the question that does make it sound like it's going to reverse.
 
Last edited:
Alias - Recheck your algebra. I ended up with

M(u^2 - v^2) = m(u-v)^2

There's only one factor of (u-v) that cancels on each side. Multiply out what you're left with and group u on one side and v on the other.
 
i see where u go that from so once u-v cancels
u get
M(u+v) = m(u-v)
which isn't equal to
m(v+u) = M (u -v)
the equation that I am looking for is it? hang onnn. if i sub in negitive v now ill get..
M(u-v) = m(u+v)
ive got it!
thank you
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top