Solving Solubility Problem 1: Precipitate Disappearance

  • Thread starter Thread starter cncbmb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solubility
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the solubility problem involving the disappearance of a silver bromide precipitate after the addition of sodium thiosulfate. Initially, silver nitrate reacts with sodium bromide to form a white precipitate of silver bromide. The addition of aqueous ammonia does not dissolve the precipitate due to the instability of the ammonia complex with silver bromide. However, when sodium thiosulfate is introduced, it shifts the equilibrium, effectively dissolving the precipitate. This process highlights the importance of complexation and equilibrium in solubility reactions.
cncbmb
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
1. The Problem

The Following Steps Occur in Order:
a. Aqueous silver nitrate is added to a sodium bromide solution to form a white precipitate.
b. Aqeuous ammonia is added to the above. The contents of the container change color slightly and there is still a precipitate.
c. After step b, sodium thiosulfate is added and all of the precipitate disappears.

Part 1: Explain why the precipitate disappears in step c.
Part 2: Find the reaction that occurs in part c.

Homework Equations


none

3. Attempt to Solve the Problem

After step a, we have silver bromide, which is the initial precipitate.

After step b, I thought that we had $Ag(NH_3)_2^{+}$ and some bromide and nitrate anions, so I predicted that there wouldn't be a precipitate. My prediction was wrong and I realized that I made an error in tracing the reactions.

I. Why is there still a precipitate at the end of part b?

II. Why does the addition of sodium thiosulfate make the precipitates disappear?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It all depends on the equilibrium between precipitate and the complexing agent. Ammonia complex is not stable enough to dissolve AgBr (although it is stable enough to dissolve AgCl).
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top