Solving Spaceship Chase Scene Relative Velocity Problem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter frerelupin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spaceship
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a relative velocity problem involving two spaceships, A and B, traveling at different speeds. Participants explore the implications of special relativity, including time dilation and length contraction, while attempting to reconcile the different perspectives of observers in various reference frames. The scope includes theoretical reasoning and mathematical modeling related to relativistic effects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the relative velocities of the spaceships as 0.588c and -0.588c, while another participant provides a different calculation resulting in 0.303c and -0.303c.
  • There is a disagreement on whether the velocity addition formula should use subtraction in the denominator, as both spaceships are moving in the same direction.
  • One participant emphasizes the necessity of considering the relativity of simultaneity in addition to length contraction when analyzing the problem.
  • Another participant suggests using Lorentz transformations to analyze the scenario from the perspectives of each spaceship rather than breaking it down into velocity addition and contraction.
  • A later reply indicates a successful application of Lorentz transformations to derive the relative velocity, affirming the initial calculations of 0.588c.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct approach to calculating relative velocities and the necessity of incorporating simultaneity. There is no consensus on the correct method, and multiple competing views remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved assumptions regarding the application of simultaneity and the specific conditions under which the velocities are calculated. The discussion also highlights the complexity of applying relativistic principles without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in special relativity, particularly those exploring concepts of relative motion, time dilation, and length contraction in different reference frames, may find this discussion relevant.

frerelupin
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have been pondering but cannot quite resolve the following question:

Imagine two spaceships, separated by 4 light-seconds initially. Spaceship A is traveling at 0.8c and Spaceship B (the one with the lead) is traveling at 0.4c.

Clearly an external observer will see this "chase" last for 10 seconds.
Spaceship A determines that the chase lasts ~6 seconds.
Spaceship B determines that the chase lasts ~9.17 seconds.

Calculating their velocities relative to one another is trivial and will be 0.588c and -0.588c.

Here is my conundrum: I want to be able to show that all frames are relative thus doing Einstein a solid. I feel I should be able to do this just using d=vt if I can answer the following question:

How far does Spaceship B appear to travel from A's perspective, and vice versa.

I can't quite get this to work out, but I feel that Spaceship A should see Spaceship B coming at them for 6 seconds at -0.588c, which means they covered 3.53 light-seconds, and that Spaceship B should see Spaceship A coming at them for 9.17 seconds at 0.588c meaning they covered 5.39 light-seconds.

There should be a manner in which I can determine the distance each appeared to travel using length contraction; that is to say, without using the times and velocities as derived above.

Am I off somewhere? Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It may be trivial but that is not what I get for their relative velocities. I get
[tex]\frac{.8c- .4c}{(1+ .8(.4)}= (.4c)/(1.32)= 0.303c[/tex]
and -.303c
 
Shouldn't the function in the denominator be subtraction? They are both traveling in the positive direction, so I would think there would be a subtraction in the numerator as well as the denominator.
 
I agree with +/- .588 c relative speed.

However, the problem is you cannot just use length contraction. Like it or not, you must use relativity of simultaneity as well. The initial distance of 4 light seconds is using the 'external' observer's simultaneity. The .8c rocket not only disagrees with the 4 light seconds, but it also disagrees with the external observer as when the .4 rocket was contracted 4 light seconds light seconds away.

The easiest way to work such a problem is to ignore the breakdown into velocity addition, contraction, simultaneity, and just Lorentz transform the whole scenario from 'external' to .8c rockect, then from external to .4 rocket.
 
PAllen: Hmmmm... if I understand what you're saying (and I'm not certain I do!) you mean to say just do the velocity addition anyway? I'm trying to find a way around that part. As I said in my original post, I want to be able to show that v=d/t works in the rest frame, the 0.8c frame, and the 0.4c frame as long as we use the properly framed d and t values.

If you are saying I could do this, could you elaborate on which transforms you are talking about? Do you mean to say use:

\begin{equation}
x'=\frac{x-ut}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
t'=\frac{t-\left(\frac{u}{c^2}\right)x}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}
\end{equation}
 
Woot! PAllen, you the man! Here's what I did:

\begin{equation}
v'=\frac{x'}{t'}=\frac{\frac{x-ut}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}}{\frac{t-\left(\frac{u}{c^2}\right)x}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}}=\frac{x-ut}{t-\frac{ux}{c^2}=0.588c
\end{equation}

Done! Thank you so much! This has been bothering me for a while now.

Cheers!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K