Solving Spherical Conductor: Net Charge and Electric Field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a solid spherical conductor with a net charge of zero and a charged object placed in its cavity. The charge on the inner cavity surface is -4.00 nC due to induction, as the 4.00 nC charge attracts an equal negative charge from the conductor. The electric field magnitude at a distance of 3.00 m from the center is calculated using Gauss's Law, resulting in 3.996 V/m. The concept of electric flux through a closed surface is also explored, emphasizing that the net charge enclosed by a Gaussian surface within the conductor remains zero. Understanding these principles relies heavily on the application of Gauss's Law and the symmetry of the system.
tica86
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
A solid spherical conductor of radius 1.50 m has a small spherical cavity of radius 0.50 m with the same center. The net charge of the conductor is zero. An object with a net charge of 4.00 nC is placed inside the cavity in such a way that it is isolated from the conductor. I know the answers I just want to be able to understand the concept.

1)What is the charge on the inner cavity surface?

I know it is -4.00nC but why??


2)What is the electric field magnitude 3.00m from the center of the sphere?
E(4pi*r^2)=Q/E0
THE ANSWER is 3.996 V/m again I don't understand..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For 1) It's induction. The 4 nC charge pulls a minus 4 nC charge towards itself from the conductor. 2) Is Gauss' law, and there really isn't another way to explain it.
 
You can also explain (1) using Gauss's Law. Consider a sphere of radius 0.60 m (It could anything greater than 0.50 and less than 1.50 m.) with center at the same location as the other two spheres. The electric field is zero, everywhere on the surface of this sphere.

How much flux passes through this closed surface?

What is the net charge enclosed by the surface of this sphere?
 
perfect symmetry -> use Gauss' Law :)

(Gaussian surface inside the conduction outer shell)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top