Solving Subscripted Variable Equations: Formula and Example Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Richay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variables
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving subscripted variable equations, specifically two examples provided by participants. The first problem involves the equations RETE = RWTW, RE = 200, RW = 250, and 9 - TE = TW, leading to the correct solution of (TE, TW) = (5, 4) through a systematic approach rather than trial and error. The second problem, NN + ND = 150 and 5NN + 10ND = 450, is also suggested to be solved using a similar method of linear equations. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the reduction method for solving these equations effectively. The conversation highlights the challenges faced in grasping these concepts and the need for clear instructional support.
Richay
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
What would be the formula for solving problems like this?

Solve for all variables.

RETE = RWTW, RE = 200, RW = 250, 9 - TE = TW

Answer in the form: (TE, TW)


Seems simple, but not for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RETE = RWTW, RE = 200, RW = 250, 9 - TE = TW

Answer in the form: (TE, TW)


RE(200) x TE(5) = 1000

9-5=4(TW)

RW(250) x TW(4) = 1000

I enter the answer 5, 4


But it says I am wrong.


-------------------------------

And for another one

Solve for the unknown variables.

RETE + RCTC = 263, RE = 40, RC = 7, TC = TE + 4.

Answer in the form: TE, TC

The answer is 5, 9. (I'm correct)

-----------------------------------------------

I'm stuck on this one though

NN + ND = 150

5NN + 10ND = 450

Answer in the form: (NN, ND)
 
Last edited:
Ever heard of the reduction method?
 
Not "reduction method". My teahcer doesn't teach, he expects us to know everything.

Yet, i don't understand how i got the first problem wrong. I understand what I'm doing though, to an extent.
 
Uhmm, you've solved the first problem correctly, the answer is (5, 4). However, tis problem should not be done by Trial and Error method. This problem is to solve the system of equations.
The first equation is RE TE = RW TW
So your first equation is 200 TE = 250 TW, or in other words, if you divide both sides by 50, you'll get 4 TE = 5 TW, or 4 TE - 5 TW = 0.
Now the second equation is 9 - TE = TW or TE + TW = 9
So we have a syatem of 2 linear equations, and we need to solve for 2 unknows, i.e TE, and TW:
\left\{ \begin{array}{l} 4TE - 5TW = 0 \quad (1) \\ TE + TW = 9 \quad (2) \end{array} \right.
We first multiply 2 sides of the equation (2) by 4. Why? In the first equation, we have 4 TE, and we need 4 TE in the second equation, too.
After multiplying, we will have:
\Leftrightarrow \left\{ \begin{array}{l} 4TE - 5TW = 0 \quad (1) \\ 4 TE + 4 TW = 36 \quad (2) \end{array} \right.
Now, if we subtract 2 sides of equation (1) from 2 sides of equation (2), we'll have:
9 TW = 36 => TW = 4
Then we can either plug TW = 4 into equation (1), or (2), to solve for TE. Say we'll plug it in equation (1) 4 TE - 5 . 4 = 0 <=> 4TE = 20 <=> TE = 5.
So the solution to the system is:
\Leftrightarrow \left\{ \begin{array}{l} TE = 5 \\ TW = 4 \end{array} \right.
Can you get this? :)
The third problem can be solved in the same manner. :)
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top