Solving Summations: Tips & Tricks for Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter CMBR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body System
CMBR
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See the attachment, I am stuck as to how the summation sign \sum_{b\neq a}^{} in (2.1.1) ends up as \sum_{ab}^{} in the term with the red dot above (2.1.5).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



As I understand you end up taking the product of two summations such that \sum_{a}^{}(\sum_{b\neq a}^{})=\sum_{ab}^{}, but I don't really understand the logic here.

just trying to understand, thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • Help.png
    Help.png
    35.3 KB · Views: 516
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a subindex ##a## missing from what should be ##\dot{\bf r}_a## from equation 2.1.4 and subsequently in ##\ddot{\bf r}_a## in 2.1.5. The rest is just inserting 2.1.1.
 
yeh I got that but once you insert 2.1.1 i don't get how the summation in front of the red dot term is \sum_{ab}^{} once you sub 2.1.1 you get \sum_{a}^{}(\sum_{b\neq a}^{}), I don't really understand how that works
 
Last edited:
You are making a sum of sums. It may help to write the sums out for a small number of particles, let us say 3:
$$
\sum_{a} \sum_{b\neq a} F_{ab} = (F_{12} + F_ {13}) + [F_{21} + F_{23}] + \{F_{31} + F_{21}\}
$$
where the term in () is the term originating from the sum over ##b \neq 1## for ##a = 1##, [] for ##a = 2##, and {} for ##a = 3##. Now ##\sum_{ab}## is a bit of a bastard notation. If assuming that we by this mean ##\sum_{a=1}^3 \sum_{b=1}^3##, then we get some additional terms ##F_{11} + F_{22} + F_{33}##, but the particles do not exert forces onto themselves so these can be taken to be zero.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Yeh I sort of came to a similar conclusion myself, the issue was that I didn't get why you can use the notation \sum_{ab}^{} if you neglect particle self interactions, the notation in that case is not strictly true then? Wouldn't it be better to keep it in the form \sum_{a}^{}(\sum_{b\neq a}^{}), anyway thanks for the clarifications!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top