What I meant by that is just what you did
What you have is good, but many lines may have the same y-intercept and yet not be the same. Set also the slopes equal and insist that [itex]x_1\neq x_2[/itex]. The system thus obtained is
[tex]\left\{\begin{array}{cc}f(x_{1})-x_{1}f^{\prime}(x_{1})=f(x_{2})-x_{2}f^{\prime}(x_{2})\\f^{\prime}(x_{1})=f^{\prime}(x_{2}) \\ x_1\neq x_2 \end{array}\right.[/tex]
The answer is yes! There is exactly one line tangent to f(x) at two or more points, namely
[tex]x_1=\frac{95}{18}-\frac{1}{18}\sqrt{42195}\mbox{ and } x_2=\frac{95}{18}+\frac{1}{18}\sqrt{42195}[/tex]
The equation of the common tangent line is
[tex]y=\frac{1736927}{81}x+\frac{275062225}{2916}[/tex]
There's a plot of f(x) and the tangent line attached at the bottom.
So I'll get you started on that system now: simplify the intercept equation while keeping in mind the derivatives (slopes) are equal to get
[tex]\frac{f(x_{1})-f(x_{2})}{x_{1}-x_{2}} =f^{\prime}(x_{1})=f^{\prime}(x_{2})[/tex]
and not that [tex]f(x_{1})-f(x_{2})[/tex] has a factor of [tex]x_{1}-x_{2}[/tex] since
[tex]f(x_{1})-f(x_{2}) = -9x_{1}^4 + 190x_{1}^3 + 840x_{1}^2 + 1992x_{1} - \left( -9x_{2}^4 + 190x_{2}^3 + 840x_{2}^2 + 1992x_{2}\right)[/tex]
[tex]= -9\left( x_{1}^4- x_{2}^4 \right) + 190\left( x_{1}^3- x_{2}^3 \right) + 840\left( x_{1}^2- x_{2}^2 \right) + 1992\left( x_{1}- x_{2} \right)[/tex]
[tex]= -9\left( x_{1}^2+ x_{2}^2 \right) \left( x_{1} + x_{2} \right) \left( x_{1}- x_{2} \right) + 190\left( x_{1}- x_{2} \right) \left( x_{1}^2+x_{1}x_{2} + x_{2}^2 \right) + 840\left( x_{1} + x_{2} \right) \left( x_{1}- x_{2} \right) + 1992\left( x_{1}- x_{2} \right)[/tex]
so that
[tex]\frac{f(x_{1})-f(x_{2})}{x_{1}-x_{2}} = -9\left( x_{1}^2+ x_{2}^2 \right) \left( x_{1} + x_{2} \right) + 190 \left( x_{1}^2+x_{1}x_{2} + x_{2}^2 \right) + 840\left( x_{1} + x_{2} \right) + 1992 = f^{\prime}(x_{1})=f^{\prime}(x_{2})[/tex]
Also, [tex]f^{\prime}(x_{1}) = -36x_{1}^3 + 570x_{1}^2 +1680x_{1} +1992[/tex]
and [tex]f^{\prime}(x_{2}) = -36x_{2}^3 + 570x_{2}^2 +1680x_{2} +1992[/tex]
I got to do mine own homework now, sorry... see if you can get it from there. (I solved the system at the top using Maple, so I'm not yet sure that this approach will pan-out nicely, so be careful).
Oh yeah, I just put a and b instead of x1 and x2, and what I meant by that is just what you did.