Solving Tension Problem with 3 Cables | Philip

  • Thread starter Thread starter philipc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cables Tension
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving a tension problem involving a weight supported by three cables in the XZ plane. Philip initially attempted to use a TI-89 calculator to solve a system of nine equations derived from the tensions in the cables, leading to confusion. After receiving advice, he realized that only three equations were necessary if the angles of the cables were known, simplifying the problem significantly. Ultimately, he successfully solved the problem by focusing on the three tensions as unknowns and applying vector sum principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium conditions in physics
  • Familiarity with vector decomposition in three dimensions
  • Knowledge of trigonometry to determine angles between cables
  • Experience with solving systems of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in mechanics
  • Learn vector decomposition techniques for three-dimensional problems
  • Explore methods for solving systems of linear equations
  • Investigate the use of graphical methods to visualize tension problems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and anyone involved in mechanics or structural analysis who needs to understand tension problems in multi-cable systems.

philipc
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
I'm a bit stuck on a tension problem, I have a weight supported by three cables.
I will have to admit, up to this point, I have been cheating on these tension problems. What I have been doing is writing various equations and using my TI-89 to solve the system of equations. This method has been working for me when having only two cables or the three cables being some what symmetric. This problem puts the three cables all on the X, Z plane (judging by the picture) but they have no symmetry beyond that. Using my method I have nine unknowns, so I created to what I believed to be 9 valid equations, but my TI-89 didn't really like that.
I once remember my professor talking about some sort of triangle, so my question, is there a better way to solve this sort of problem. I'm not asking for the problem to be solved, I just need a different approach.
Thanks guys and gals
Philip
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To get the needed equations, consider the conditions for equilibrium: The sum of the forces in any direction must be zero; the net torque about any point must be zero.

If you really have 9 equations and 9 unknowns, what's the problem? Solve it, step by step. (To get more targeted advice, show the exact problem and your attempted solution.)
 
Doc,
I was just wondering if there was a different approach that using 9 equations, some general laws I'm missing out on.
To show the exact problem would be much harder than describing it, it's pretty simple, just imagine a mass hanging from three cables, and there three cables can be attached any where on the x,z plane. Where the mass is attached to the three cables on the negative y axis.
Far as my 9 equations, I'm guessing that I went down a wrong path, giving me incomplete data for the TI-89 to work with.
Setting the three separate x,y,z tensions equal only gives me three equations. What would be the next approach to obtain the next 6 equations?
Thanks
Philip
 
If you have the angles that the cables make, then all you probably need are three equations. (The tensions are the three unknowns.) If you don't have the angles, then you don't have enough information to solve for the tensions.
 
I just solved it, thanks
I do have the locations of the points where the cables are attached, so I can make the angles. What I was doing was breaking each tension into 3 parts giving me 9 unknowns. I found a similar problems solved where they only used the three tensions as unknowns and used the sum of each i,j,k vector to make 3 equations. This method was much easier and giving only three unknowns, so it all worked out in the end.
Thanks again
Philip
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K