Solving Tension Problem with 3 Cables | Philip

  • Thread starter Thread starter philipc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cables Tension
AI Thread Summary
Philip encountered difficulties solving a tension problem involving a weight supported by three cables, initially relying on a TI-89 calculator to manage nine equations and unknowns. He sought advice on alternative approaches, particularly regarding the use of equilibrium conditions and the angles of the cables. After discussion, it was clarified that only three equations are needed if the angles are known, simplifying the problem significantly. Philip ultimately resolved the issue by focusing on the three tensions as unknowns and using vector sums to create the necessary equations. This method proved to be more efficient and effective for solving the tension problem.
philipc
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
I'm a bit stuck on a tension problem, I have a weight supported by three cables.
I will have to admit, up to this point, I have been cheating on these tension problems. What I have been doing is writing various equations and using my TI-89 to solve the system of equations. This method has been working for me when having only two cables or the three cables being some what symmetric. This problem puts the three cables all on the X, Z plane (judging by the picture) but they have no symmetry beyond that. Using my method I have nine unknowns, so I created to what I believed to be 9 valid equations, but my TI-89 didn't really like that.
I once remember my professor talking about some sort of triangle, so my question, is there a better way to solve this sort of problem. I'm not asking for the problem to be solved, I just need a different approach.
Thanks guys and gals
Philip
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To get the needed equations, consider the conditions for equilibrium: The sum of the forces in any direction must be zero; the net torque about any point must be zero.

If you really have 9 equations and 9 unknowns, what's the problem? Solve it, step by step. (To get more targeted advice, show the exact problem and your attempted solution.)
 
Doc,
I was just wondering if there was a different approach that using 9 equations, some general laws I'm missing out on.
To show the exact problem would be much harder than describing it, it's pretty simple, just imagine a mass hanging from three cables, and there three cables can be attached any where on the x,z plane. Where the mass is attached to the three cables on the negative y axis.
Far as my 9 equations, I'm guessing that I went down a wrong path, giving me incomplete data for the TI-89 to work with.
Setting the three separate x,y,z tensions equal only gives me three equations. What would be the next approach to obtain the next 6 equations?
Thanks
Philip
 
If you have the angles that the cables make, then all you probably need are three equations. (The tensions are the three unknowns.) If you don't have the angles, then you don't have enough information to solve for the tensions.
 
I just solved it, thanks
I do have the locations of the points where the cables are attached, so I can make the angles. What I was doing was breaking each tension into 3 parts giving me 9 unknowns. I found a similar problems solved where they only used the three tensions as unknowns and used the sum of each i,j,k vector to make 3 equations. This method was much easier and giving only three unknowns, so it all worked out in the end.
Thanks again
Philip
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top