Solving the 9-Piece Animal Puzzle

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter adoado
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Animal Puzzle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a puzzle involving 9 square pieces that can be arranged into a larger 3x3 square, where each piece has half an animal on each edge. Participants explore the mathematical representation of the problem, the complexity of solving it, and the statistical probabilities associated with random arrangements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Adrian introduces the puzzle and questions whether there is a mathematical way to represent and solve for the order and rotation of each piece.
  • One participant suggests representing the puzzle using a 3x3 matrix with integers for pieces and their rotational states, proposing a specific format for the solution.
  • Another participant calculates the number of possible arrangements of the squares, estimating it to be 95,126,814,720, and discusses the improbability of solving the puzzle by chance if there is only one valid configuration.
  • There is a correction regarding the probability calculation, with one participant pointing out the factorial notation was mistakenly included, leading to confusion about the actual probability value.
  • A later reply comments on the ambiguity of mathematical symbols, particularly factorials, in expressing concepts like shock and awe.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the complexity of the puzzle and the statistical calculations involved. There is no consensus on the probability of solving the puzzle or the uniqueness of the square arrangements.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the uniqueness of the squares and the validity of the probability calculations, which remain unresolved.

adoado
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

Recently while on a 'schoolies' vacation a few friends presented a puzzle of 9 squares pieces that can be arranged into a larger 3x3 square. Each small piece had half an animal on each edge (either the head or tail, of say, a goat for a seahorse). The aim was to rotate each piece correctly so across adjacent edges an appropriate animal formed, and with this constraint arrange them all (validly!) into the 3x3 square...


It took a good 10 minutes before I completed the puzzle, more or less based on luck. It got me wondering - it is definitely a mathematical combination - so is their any way to solve this?

Is there any way of representing such a problem mathematically, whereby one can solve for the order and rotation of each piece?

Cheers,
Adrian ;)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There are many representations possible, such as a 3x3 matrix of two-dimensional elements, the first being dimension being the set of integers 1 through 9 representing each piece, and the second being the set of integers 1 through 4 representing the four rotational possibilities.

You can choose, without loss of generality, that the final solution has rotation 1:
(1,1)(2,1)(3,1)
(4,1)(5,1)(6,1)
(7,1)(8,1)(9,1)
and have 2 mean a piece is rotated clockwise from the ideal position, 3 mean a piece is upside down, and 4 mean a piece is rotated counterclockwise.

Now, if you mix up the pieces and spin them around, any starting position can be represented, such as:

(2,1)(9,2)(4,3)
(7,4)(5,1)(3,2)
(6,3)(1,4)(8,1)
 
adoado said:
It took a good 10 minutes before I completed the puzzle, more or less based on luck.

If luck had something to do with it, it seems to me like quite a bit of a statistical improbability! I am curious, are each of the squares unique? If so, then there being 4 rotations for each of the 9 squares and 9! ways place the squares in the 3x3 grid, there are 49*9! = 95,126,814,720 possible arrangements of the squares :eek:. If there is only one configuration that solves the puzzle then, arranging the squares in a random order gives 1/95,126,814,720 * 100 = 0.00000000105% chance of solving the puzzle for that random configuration.
 
Last edited:
1/95,126,814,720! * 100 should be WAY less than 0.00000000105%. Assuming that's a 95,126,814,720 factorial.
 
Dragonfall said:
1/95,126,814,720! * 100 should be WAY less than 0.00000000105%. Assuming that's a 95,126,814,720 factorial.

Sorry, I accidentally inserted the factorial. I meant just 95,126,814,720. Thank you!
 
I wish we chose a better symbol for factorials. As it is now we can't express shock & awe in math without ambiguity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
23K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
22K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
18K