Solving the Confusing Units Issue in Atomic Energy V(R)

  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing Units
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on converting the second derivative of the potential energy function V(R) from atomic units to SI units. The user is trying to understand how to properly apply conversion factors when calculating V''(R) to ensure the result is in J/m², which represents a force constant in SI. They express confusion over the units obtained when plugging in values for R in bohrs and the subsequent discrepancies in conversion methods. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on when and how to apply unit conversions in the context of atomic energy calculations. Accurate conversion is essential for consistent results in physics and chemistry applications.
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Okay, so I have an expression for V(R) in atomic units (bohrs, hartrees, etc), where V is an energy. I'm assuming this means that if I plug in a value for R (in bohrs), I get back an energy (in hartrees). But if I take the SECOND derivative of V with respect to R, and I want to convert that to SI units, what sort of conversion factors do I need to bring out, and when?

For example, if I just take V''(R), leaving everything in atomic units, and plug in R (in bohrs), I get a number...but what units is it in? How would I convert that number to its SI equivalent, which is J/m^2?

Of course, V''(R) = d^2 V / dR^2 is supposed to be a (harmonic) force constant, which in SI would be measured in J/m^2. But I've tried a number of different approaches to doing the right sort of conversions, but each one gives me a (wildly) different answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hartree/bohr^2
 
Back
Top