Solving the Debate Over Photon Counting With a Scintillation Device

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of a scintillation device for detecting protons and the methodology for relating the output signal from a photodiode to the number of photons absorbed. Participants explore different approaches to photon counting, the implications of statistical distributions, and the challenges of measuring current pulses versus individual photons.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their setup using a CAEN DT5751 and a photodiode to measure light intensity, aiming to relate the voltage signal to the number of photons absorbed.
  • Another participant suggests that to determine the total number of photons, one must consider the quantum efficiency of the photodiode, regardless of the method used.
  • Some participants express confusion over how to convert ADC units to photons using the professor's proposed method, questioning its applicability when counting current pulses instead of individual photons.
  • Concerns are raised about the nature of the LED as a light source, with one participant arguing that it does not produce single photons and that the resulting Poissonian distribution may not indicate single photon behavior.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of dark current and how it may affect the measurements and interpretations of the results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus, with multiple competing views on the validity of the professor's method versus the participant's approach. There is ongoing debate about the implications of using a LED as a light source and the relevance of statistical distributions in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their understanding of how to apply certain equations for photon counting, particularly in relation to the nature of the light source and the measurement setup. The discussion highlights unresolved questions about the relationship between current pulses and photon counting.

Frigorifico
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I have to count the number of photons detected by a photodiode, I want to do it based on voltage/current measurements, but my professor wants me to do some statistical analysis which I think don't apply in this case
Hello, I'm working on a scintillation device to detect protons, I have a disagreement with one professor and I would like your opinion.

There is one photodiode model we want to use to measure the light intensity from the scintillators, and we want to relate the signal of that photodiode with the number of photons it is absorbing.

To do this we took a CAEN DT5751, connected a photodiode to it, and put an LED in front of the photodiode. This DT5751 samples the signal, measures its voltage, and counts how many times it has seen such a voltage, producing a histogram with a gaussian distribution, so far so good.

What I want to do is to get the mean voltage, divide by the resistance the photodiode sees (50 ohms, I measured), get the current produced by the photodiode, and use the photodiode's responsivity to get the mean number of photons. Easy piecy.

BUT my professor says that there's a better way (aka "I want this in your report"). We know that the statistical distribution of the photons is a Poissonian Distribution when N approaches infinity, which is a gaussian where sigma^2 = mean. And he is right, that distribution does fit with our results.

Then he says that we should be able to use the quantum efficiency of the photodiode and the number of counts to know the number of photons. Equation 5.57 here

Here's my problem with that reasoning: Our set up does not count photons, it counts current pulses, and each pulse is produced by the photodiode when it absorbs a bunch of photons, something like 10^10 at least, those formulas is for when you have a device capable of counting individual photons, so those formulas don't apply.

I brought up this point but he just told me to read more, and I did, I read this and this but he just said he had better things to do than to teach me what I should already know.

Maybe he's right, maybe there is a way to use photon statistics to get the total number of photons with this set up, so I come to you, is there?, has ay of you done something similar?, because I am lost.

PD:

The manual of the DT5751 says that "Input dynamic is 1 Vpp" and the values are stored with "16 MSB". I take that to mean that it has 2^16 slots to store all the values from 0 to 1 volts. For example a value of "20,000" would be 20,000/2^16 = 0.35 volts, is that correct?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm not sure where your methods actually differ. Using the voltage and the properties of the photodiode is sensitive to the number of detected photons only. To get the total number of photons hitting the photodiode you need to consider the quantum efficiency anyway.
 
You agree the professor's method gives you the right answer, but you think your method is better, do I have that right? How do you deal with dark current?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
You agree the professor's method gives you the right answer, but you think your method is better, do I have that right? How do you deal with dark current?

I agree the distribution is poissonian, the problem is that I don't see how can I go from the ADC units to photons with his method
 
mfb said:
I'm not sure where your methods actually differ. Using the voltage and the properties of the photodiode is sensitive to the number of detected photons only. To get the total number of photons hitting the photodiode you need to consider the quantum efficiency anyway.

they differ in the fact that he wants me to use that one equation to get the number of photons, but my understanding is that only works if we were counting individual photons, which we weren't
 
Frigorifico said:
To do this we took a CAEN DT5751, connected a photodiode to it, and put an LED in front of the photodiode. This DT5751 samples the signal, measures its voltage, and counts how many times it has seen such a voltage, producing a histogram with a gaussian distribution, so far so good.
If the LED is producing continuous photons, then you are measuring the spectrum of noise on the DC photodiode current while it is continuously illuminated. The gaussian voltage distribution seen with the LED, (without the scintillator), is noise from the hot LED, the photodiode efficiency, electronics, and from sampling and A to D conversion. The LED will have a different wavelength to the scintillator. When compared with the uncalibrated LED efficiency and optics, the spectral response is not really relevant.
 
Frigorifico said:
they differ in the fact that he wants me to use that one equation to get the number of photons, but my understanding is that only works if we were counting individual photons, which we weren't
I don't see an equation that would stop being true for more photons. The relative fluctuation will decrease with more photons and other sources can become more important, whether that is relevant or not depends on your setup.
 
I don't believe this makes sense. The fundamental problem is that a LED does not produce single photons; the fact that a setup gives you a Poissonian distribution is frequency used to show that something is at least approximately behaving like a single photon source (e.g. a very attenuated laser and/or a sub-threshold diode laser) and this is never the case for a LED.
Another problem is in the limit of large numbers the distribution becomes Gaussian; meaning it would be indistinguishable from random noise.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
459
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K