Courses Solving the Elective Course Dilemma for Graduate School & Employment

  • Thread starter Thread starter absurdist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Course
AI Thread Summary
Withdrawing from a C++ course may raise concerns for graduate school applications, but the impact of a "W" on a transcript largely depends on the overall academic performance and context. Experience with Visual Basic (VB) and MATLAB is valuable, but retaking the C++ course could strengthen the application, especially for competitive PhD programs. Learning C++ is beneficial as it is known for its speed and efficiency, particularly in numerical simulations, making it a preferred choice alongside C and Fortran. While MATLAB is useful, it may struggle with large datasets compared to C/C++. Overall, gaining proficiency in C++ can enhance employability and academic prospects in technical fields.
absurdist
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Ok so I was interested in programming and took up this C++ course which I withdrew from since I was taking too many credits. If I plan to apply to a top grad school (phd hopefully) does thw W on my transcript look bad? Also I now have experience with VB and MATLAB so do you think these are enough or should also I retake the C++ course to get rid of the W?
Also are there any benefits of learning C++? I've heard it gives you an edge when it comes to employment.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
C++ quite fast comparing to languages like java and python

for the purpose of numerical simulations at least one of C/C++/Fortran would be a good idea.

I don't remember the last time I heard anyone using VB (but then I don't specialize is computer science...)

MATLAB is quite handy but it definitely isn't as robust as languages stated above, iirc when you have a whole loads of data to work with it can get quite sluggish as well.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top