Solving the Equation: 8n^2 = 64 n lg(n) with Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niels
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stupid
Niels
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
How do I solve the following equation?

8n^2 = 64 n lg(n); (0 < n)

n = 8lg(n)
10^n = 10^8 n
...? How do I isolate n?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Niels said:
How do I solve the following equation?
8n^2 = 64 n lg(n); (0 < n)
n = 8lg(n)
10^n = 10^8 n
...? How do I isolate n?

Who says u can?It's typically a transcendental equation.I suggest either graphical method (intersaction of graphs) (done by computer,maybe),or taking a calculator and "solving it through tries".Your equation may have 0,1 or maximum 2 solutions.

Daniel.
 
I already did that with mathematica and got that one solution is x ~ 6.5... I just wanted to know if there was any algebraic solution...

I study running times of some algorithms and got this questions: for that values of n is the following inequality true:
8n^2 < 64 n lg(n)

Is there no analytical approach. This is a potential exam question and were not allowed to use calculators...
 
Is n supposed to be an integer?
 
Yes, n is integer (input size for algorithm) but I'm interested in both cases. (real/integer)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top