Solving the Equation: k^3-3K2+31k-37=0 with Synthetic Division

  • Thread starter Thread starter skysurani
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Division
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the cubic equation k^3 - 3k^2 + 31k - 37 = 0 using synthetic division and other methods. The user successfully applies synthetic division to find a factor of (k - 5) and identifies the remaining quadratic equation. They then use the quadratic formula to determine complex roots, resulting in k = -3 ± 2i. The final solution for y is expressed in terms of exponential and trigonometric functions, confirming the approach to solving the homogeneous equation. The conversation highlights the importance of the characteristic equation in solving ordinary differential equations with constant coefficients.
skysurani
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
solve the following promblem
Y^(,,,)-3y^(,,)+31y^(,)-37y=0
i let y = e^kx
y'= ke^kx
y''=k^2e^kx
y'''=k^3e^kx

so i got this
k^3e^kx-3(k^2e^kx)+31(ke^kx)-37(e^kx)=0
e^kx(k^3-3K2+31k-37)=0

so,

(k^3-3K2+31k-37)=0

now i have to find (K)


how should i solve for (k) from this equation k^3-3K2+31k-37=0
can i use synthetic division if yes how should i use it or which other method can i use

is this right

i solve the k by synthetic division
5 1 1 -17 -65
5 30 65
1 6 13 0

so the factor is (k-5) (K^2+6k+13)
then i use this equation
(-b+-squrt(b^2-(4ac)))/2a

and got k = -3 +- 2i

and my fianl answer is
y=c1e^5x+c2e^(-3x)cos(2x)+c3e^(-3x)sin(2x)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this the equation

\frac{d^{3}y}{dx^{3}}-3\frac{d^2y}{dx^{2}}+31\frac{dy}{dx}-37y=0

Daniel.
 
Since the equation is homogeneous and has constant coefficients, you can just solve its characteristic equation.

You'll have an equation of the form:

y(x) = c_1 e^{\lambda_1 x} + c_2 e^{\lambda_2 x} + c_3 e^{\lambda_3 x}

If the equation turns out to have two complex roots (I won't say if it does), you'll have a solution somewhat different:

y(x) = c_1 e^{\lambda_1 x} + c_2 e^{\alpha x} \cos{\beta x} + c_ 3 e^{\alpha x} \sin{\beta x}

Where,

\lambda_2 = \alpha + \beta i
\lambda_3 = \alpha - \beta i

All of this should be in bold print (well, almost) in any ODE book.
 
Last edited:
how should i solve for (k)

I'd try starting with the rational root theorem, and simply check all the possibilities for a rational solution for k.

(PS wasn't there a 9 in there before?)
 
Hurkyl said:
(PS wasn't there a 9 in there before?)

There was. Otherwise, I would've mentioned the rational root theorem, as well. Don't you love it when you submit a (generous) post full of tips and someone changes the nature of the problem?
 
Here's the solution,courtesy of Maple.

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top