Solving the Inequality: How to Find the Solution for (a-x+1)(a-x+2) ≤ a?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nightking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
To solve the inequality (a-x+1)(a-x+2) ≤ a, first expand the left side and rearrange it to isolate terms involving x. It’s crucial to remember that dividing by zero is not allowed, and dividing by a negative number requires flipping the inequality sign. A suggested approach is to express the left side as a difference of squares, specifically using the form ((a - x + 3/2) - 1/2)((a - x + 3/2) + 1/2) ≤ a. This method will help in finding x in terms of the constant a. Following these steps will lead to a clearer solution for the inequality.
nightking
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How can I solve this inequality?

(a-x+1)(a-x+2) ≤ a

where a is a constant with unknown value.

Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey nightking and welcome to the forums.

You need to expand out the left hand side and then put on side completely in terms of x.

The rules for inequalities are that you can't divide any side by zero (you also have to make sure any variables you have are not zero either if you want to divide), if you divide by a negative number you flip the inequality sign, if you subtract or add a term the sign doesn't change.
 
If you want to find x in terms of a, I would start with
((a - x + 3/2) - 1/2)((a - x + 3/2) + 1/2) ≤ a

The left hand side is then the difference of two squares...
 
AlephZero said:
If you want to find x in terms of a, I would start with
((a - x + 3/2) - 1/2)((a - x + 3/2) + 1/2) ≤ a

The left hand side is then the difference of two squares...

Brilliant. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top