Solving the Mystery of the Skier and the Snowball

  • Thread starter Thread starter eil2001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mystery
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the angle at which a skier loses contact with a frictionless spherical snowball while skiing down. The key concept is the conservation of mechanical energy, where the initial potential energy at the top equals the sum of potential and kinetic energy at the point of losing contact. The skier's initial small velocity raises questions about whether it should be considered negligible. To find the angle, participants suggest calculating the height at which the skier leaves the snowball, involving trigonometric functions. Ultimately, the answer is established as 48.2 degrees, but the method to derive this remains a point of confusion for some.
eil2001
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Ok, here's the question:

A skier starts at the top of a very large frictionless spherical snowball, with a very small initial velocity, and skis straight down the side. At what point does she lose contact with the snowball and fly off at a tangent? That is, at the instant when she loses contact with the snowball, what angle does a radial line from the center of the snowball to the skier make with the vertical?

So, I want to use K_1 + U_1 = K_2 + U_2, but I am confused b/c there are no numbers. The answer is 48.2 degrees, but I don't see how they get this.

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
when she is about to lose contact, the Normal force is zero. At the top of the cliff the only type of energy is Pot. grav. (mgh), but when she is about to lose contact she has both potential and kinetic energy which their sum is equal to the first mgh.
You should find the angle by computing the second height.
 
At the top of the snowball, isn't there kinetic energy, too, b/c the problem says that the skier starts with a small initial velocity? Or, is that "small" supposed to mean negligible? Also, how do I find the height at which the skier leaves the snowball? I feel like it's something w/angles and sines/cosines, but I'm not sure. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top