Solving the Schroedinger Wave Eq. for Li Atom

  • Thread starter Thread starter pzona
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom Wave
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on setting up the Schrödinger Wave Equation for the lithium atom, emphasizing the importance of including electron-electron interactions. The user expresses confidence in using the Hamiltonian operator but feels uncertain about handling multiple electrons and accounting for their interactions. Clarification is sought on whether to consider charges or positions when addressing these interactions. The user plans to attend a review session for further assistance and is looking for guidance on factors to include in the Hamiltonian operator. The conversation highlights the challenges of applying quantum chemistry concepts to multi-electron systems.
pzona
Messages
234
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Set up the Schroedinger Wave Equation for Li. Hint: Don’t forget to consider electron-electron
interactions.


Homework Equations


H^\Psi=E\Psi, etc.


The Attempt at a Solution


I understand how to set up the equation, i.e. how to use the H^ operator, obtain solutions for \Psi, and I'm fairly sure I can solve it (for H anyway). I'm more unsure of how to solve it for multiple electron atoms than anything else. I'm guessing that I'll have to do it three times, once for each electron. Is this correct? Also, where do I begin to account for electron-electron interactions? I'm not sure what this means, as we never explicitly went over it in class. Does this pertain to the charges, or just positions? I'm not asking anyone to do the problem for me (I'd much rather do it myself actually), but if someone could give me a place to start, I'd appreciate it; I'm completely lost.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose question asks just for correct H operator, one that takes all interactions into account. But I can be wrong, my Quantum Chemistry long ago fall apart leaving just a pinch of rust.

--
methods
 
Thanks, Borek, I actually hadn't considered that. I'm planning on going to a review session tomorrow night so hopefully I'll be able to get some help with this then. Any idea on what factors to consider (i.e. charge? electron energy?) when calculating the Hamiltonian operator for multiple electrons? I don't want to seem like I'm asking the professor to just give me answers.
 
e2/ri,j for each pair of electrons (where ri,j is a distance)?

Don't treat me too seriously, I am sneezing. I am sneezing because I had to dust my quantum chemistry book to check if I am right. I don't remember seeing book with that thick layer of dust. I have to take a shower.

--
methods
 
Lol, I understand

Well that seems to be a good place for me to start. Thanks a lot for your help.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top