Solving the Tricky 3cos(x) + sin(x) - 1 Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
On my math final, there was this bastard of a trig problem that I simply couldn't solve. I knew the equations to use, how to solve the problem, but the answers just didn't work...

Anyway, the question was this:
Find all positive values of x for x being greater than or equal to zero, and less than or equal to 360.
3cos(x) + sin(x) - 1

How would you go about solving this? I tried graphing the equation and finding the x-intercept, but the values i got didn't work for whatever reason...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When you say 360, do you mean degrees?
Since cos(x)=sqrt(1-sin2(x)), you can set it up as a quadratic equation in cos(x), solve and go from there - discarding any solutions where sin2+cos2 does not add up to 1.
 
The best way when you have a linear trig. equation is to use parametric formulae

t=tan(x/2)

then sin(x)=2t/(t^2+1) and cos(x)=(1-t^2)/(1+t^2)

you substitute them into the equation and solve it into t, simple, isn't it?

Never heard about that? Quite strange.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top