Solving the Verticle Wave Problem: Time to Reach Equilibrium for a 0.2 kg Load

  • Thread starter Thread starter timtng
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the time required for a 0.2 kg load hanging from a spring with an elastic constant of 20 N/m to reach its equilibrium position after being pulled down 0.1 m. The initial calculation of 0.628 seconds is based on the formula for the period of simple harmonic motion, T=2π√(m/k). One participant mistakenly suggests that the time to reach equilibrium should be a quarter of that period, equating to 0.157 seconds. However, it is clarified that the load will reach equilibrium after one full oscillation, confirming that the correct time is indeed 0.628 seconds. Thus, the initial calculation is validated as accurate.
timtng
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
A load of mass .2 kg is hanging from a light spring whose elastic constant is 20 N/m. The load is pulled down .1 m from its equilibrium position and released.

How long is required for the load to reach its equilibrium position?

This is what I did:
T=2π(sqrt(m/k))=.628 s

my friend said the answer should be a fourth of that value, which is .157 s.

Is my friend correct?

Please help
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your friend is correct. The period you calculated is for one complete oscillation (that is, if the mass went pass equilibrium position, reached a stopping point, turned around, went pass equilibrium position again, and arrived at where you started from). From the stretched position, to get to equilibium requires 1/4 of a complete oscillation.
 


No, your friend is not correct. Your calculation of 0.628 seconds is the correct answer. The equation T=2π√(m/k) is the formula for the period of a simple harmonic motion, which is the time it takes for the object to complete one full oscillation. In this case, the load will reach its equilibrium position after one full oscillation, so the time required for it to reach equilibrium is equal to the period. Therefore, your calculation of 0.628 seconds is the correct answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top