Solving the Wave Equation Using Separation of Variables

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the wave equation using separation of variables, specifically deriving Eq. 9.20 from Griffiths. Participants express confusion about separating variables and suggest representing the function f(z,t) as a product of sine and cosine functions. The wave equation in question is a 1D linear PDE, and there is a mention of applying the Fourier transform for a solution. Boundary conditions for electromagnetic waves are noted to be non-existent, allowing for solutions to be expressed as a Fourier series or integral. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proper mathematical representation in solving the wave equation.
pt176900
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
From Griffiths: Problem 9.4 Obtain Eq. 9.20 directly from the wave equation, by separation of variables.

Eq. 9.20: f(z,t)~ = integral [-inf, inf] A~(k)e^i(kz-wt) dk

where ~ denotes the complex conjugate

the wave equation: f''(z) = (1/v^2) f''(t)

I'm a little confused on how I can separate the variables. Can I assume that I can represent f(z,t) as A sin(kz)cos(kvt) and then calculate the aforementioned 2nd derivatives.

I think my reasoning is correct but my math... well my math isn't up to par.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to solve the the 1D linear PDE

\frac{\partial^{2} f}{\partial z^{2}}=\frac{1}{v^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2} f}{\partial t^{2}}

with proper boundary conditions (field-type)...?

Use the Fourier transform...

Daniel.
 
What are the boundary conditions for an electromagnetic wave?
 
There are none.Simply the solution be writible as a Fourier series (discrete spectrum of frequencies),or as Fourier integral...

Daniel.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top